首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Power-to-fuels through carbon dioxide Re-Utilization and high- temperature electrolysis: A technical and economical comparison between synthetic methanol and methane
【24h】

Power-to-fuels through carbon dioxide Re-Utilization and high- temperature electrolysis: A technical and economical comparison between synthetic methanol and methane

机译:通过二氧化碳再利用和高温电解能量 - 燃料:合成甲醇和甲烷之间的技术和经济比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This work conveys the study of the production of synthetic fuels, in this case, methane and methanol, by means of comparing two processes that employ high-temperature water splitting based on solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC) technology. In both cases, the process consists of mixing hydrogen produced by electrolysis with carbon dioxide in order to achieve hydrogenation synthesis via a catalytic reactor. An energy analysis was performed with special care on thermal integration (minimization of external heat requirements) via pinch analysis, as well as a final estimation of power-to-fuel overall efficiency. The study demonstrates that power-to-methane and power-to-methanol process can achieve efficiency of up to approximate to 77% and approximate to 59%, respectively. The energy analysis (based on the process modelling developed for both the systems) and the heat exchange network design enabled the development of capital expenditure estimation. An economic analysis comparison for the production cost of both synthetic fuels was performed with the purpose of highlighting any potential risk associated with the systems. The economic analysis considered the impact on synthetic fuel cost of some parameters as electrolysis specific costs, the expenditure for carbon dioxide, electricity price, and yearly operating hours. The results show that for both systems, as expected, the SOEC electrolyzer is the greatest capital expenditure of the design. Methanol synthesis plant showed lower efficiency and higher investment costs; on the other hand, fossil-based methanol has higher costs ($/MWh) than fossil methane; thus, the breakeven point of electricity price (i.e., that making economically comparable synthetic and fossil fuel) is similar for the two considered cases. It was concluded that to produce an economically attractive market for methane and methanol, the production plants should maintain a utilization factor of approximately 50%, the cost of SOECs should be near to 1050 (sic)/kW and the electricity required to run the system needs to be supplied from renewable sources at a very low cost (below 40-50 $/MWh). (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通过比较基于固体氧化物电解细胞(SOEC)技术的两种方法,该工作通过比较了采用高温水分裂的两种方法来传达对合成燃料的生产的研究,在这种情况下,甲烷和甲醇。在这两种情况下,该过程包括通过用二氧化碳电解产生的氢气,以通过催化反应器实现氢化合成。通过PINCH分析专门对热集成(最小化外部热量需求最小化)进行能量分析,以及最终估计电力到燃料整体效率。该研究表明,能量 - 甲烷和功率 - 甲醇方法可以达到近似达到77%的效率,并分别近似为59%。能量分析(基于为系统开发的过程建模)和热交换网络设计使得资本支出估算的发展能够发展。通过突出与系统相关的任何潜在风险的目的进行经济分析比较两种合成燃料的生产成本。经济学分析认为,对某些参数的影响对电解特定成本的影响,二氧化碳的支出,电价和年度运行时间。结果表明,对于两个系统,正如预期的那样,SOEC电解柜是设计的最大资本支出。甲醇合成厂表现出较低的效率和更高的投资成本;另一方面,化石的甲醇比化石甲烷更高的成本($ / mwh);因此,Breakeven of电价(即,使经济上可比合成和化石燃料)的光点相似,对于两种被认为的病例相似。它的结论是,为甲烷和甲醇生产经济上有吸引力的市场,生产植物应保持约50%的利用率,因此SOEC的成本应靠近1050(SIC)/ kW,并且需要运行系统所需的电力需要以非常低的成本(低于40-50 $ / MWH)的可再生来源提供。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号