首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Targeted grassland production - A Danish case study on multiple benefits from converting cereal to grasslands for green biorefinery
【24h】

Targeted grassland production - A Danish case study on multiple benefits from converting cereal to grasslands for green biorefinery

机译:有针对性的草原生产 - 丹麦案例研究对绿色生物术士的草原转换谷物的多种效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current research on, e.g. agricultural supply-chains, engages in implementing new technologies enabling extraction of protein from other sources than soya such as grass, clover, or alfalfa. Still, it is not obvious where to initiate production of the biorefinery crop without damaging existing ecological systems or maybe even to strengthen local environments.This paper uses a targeted approach to identify the most suitable agricultural areas to convert from cereal to grassland production while gaining multiple environmental benefits. For the Danish region, three individual biomass goals were set: 1) reach 3 x 10(6) t dry matter from organically produced non-fertilized grass-clover mixtures, and 2) reach 5 x 10(6) t dry matter from grass fertilized with 300 kg N/ha, or 3) 450 kg N/ha. Areas for conversion were selected based on coastal nitrogen (N) loads and a surrounding nature index in a stepwise manor until the three biomass goals were reached separately.Our results reveal a spatial distribution of some of the areas selected for conversion close to existing nature areas and vulnerable aquatic environments for all goals. Producing 5 x 10(6) t dry matter fertilizing grass with 450 kg N/ha requires less agricultural area (23% of total agricultural area) compared to fertilizing with 300 kg N/ha (28%) and even less than producing only 3 x 10(6) t dry matter without fertilizing (24% of total agricultural land). Despite less land area, goal 3 still has a higher coastal N load compared to goal 2, and consequently goal 2 reaches 50-60% of the national N reduction goal to reduce 13,000 t N compared to 21-28% for goal 3. Furthermore, surrounding nature shows a higher index value for goal 2 compared to goal 3. Hence, in our case goal 3 would be preferable if land scarcity was the heaviest weighing factor. Still, the environmental gain resulting from using goal 1 and 2 would increase potential multifunctionality of converting from cereal to grass production. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:目前的研究,例如,农业供应链,从事从其他来源提取蛋白质的新技术,这些技术比其他来源从其他来源中提取,例如草,三叶草或苜蓿。尽管如此,在不损害现有的生态系统的情况下启动生物遗产作物的生产并不明显,甚至可以加强当地环境。本文采用目标方法来确定最适合的农业领域,以便在获得多个时从谷物转换为草地生产。环境效益。对于丹麦地区,设定了三个单独的生物量目标:1)从有机产生的非受精草三叶草混合物中达到3×10(6)吨干物质,2)从草地上达到5×10(6)吨干物质用300kg n / ha施肥,或3)450 kg n / ha。基于沿海氮气(n)载荷和逐步庄园的围绕性质指数选择转换区域,直到分别达到三个生物量目标。结果揭示了选择用于转换的一些区域的空间分布,靠近现有的自然区域。所有目标的易受攻击的水生环境。产生5×10(6)吨干物质施肥,与450公斤,450公斤的施肥草需要较少的农业面积(占农业总面积的23%),与施肥有300公斤(28%),甚至不到仅生产3 X 10(6)T干物质不施肥(占农业总土地的24%)。尽管土地面积较少,但与目标2相比,目标3仍然具有较高的沿海N负载,因此目标2达到50-60%的国家N还原目标,以减少13,000吨,而目标3的21-28%。此外,周围性质显示目标2的较高指标值与目标3相比3.因此,如果土地稀缺是最重的重量因素,我们的案例3将是优选的。尽管如此,使用目标1和2产生的环境收益将增加从谷物到草生产的潜在多功能性。 (c)2019年由elestvier有限公司发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号