首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >How does trenchless technology make pipeline construction greener? A comprehensive carbon footprint and energy consumption analysis
【24h】

How does trenchless technology make pipeline construction greener? A comprehensive carbon footprint and energy consumption analysis

机译:挖掘技术如何使管道建设更环保?全面的碳足迹和能耗分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pipelines are the primary means of transporting energy or resources, such as oil, natural gas, or water. Nowadays, with the increasing demand for resources, the construction of pipelines is also increasing. Under the context of promoting green production, the open-cut method has been unable to meet the requirements of environmental protection. Therefore, trenchless technology has become an alternative to pipeline construction, which has the characteristics of fast construction speed and low carbon footprint. This paper briefly introduces a variety of typical trenchless installation and renewal methods. Based on the relevant theory of carbon footprint calculation during construction, the energy consumption and carbon footprint from the open-cut method and the trenchless construction methods under the same conditions are compared. Moreover, the sensitivity of different construction methods to different factors is analyzed. The main conclusions are drawn: (1) In most cases, the cured-in-place pipe method has less energy consumption and carbon footprint than other pipeline repair methods and is less affected by various design factors. (2) Various trenchless technologies have reduced construction energy consumption and carbon footprint to varying degrees relative to the open-cut method. (3) When the construction length is short or the depth is very shallow, the energy consumption and carbon footprint of the trenchless method may be higher than the open-cut method. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:管道是运输能量或资源的主要方法,例如石油,天然气或水。如今,随着对资源的日益增长,管道的建设也在增加。在促进绿色生产的背景下,开放式方法一直无法满足环保要求。因此,挖沟技术已成为管道结构的替代方案,具有快速施工速度和低碳足迹的特点。本文简要介绍了各种典型的恒星安装和更新方法。基于施工过程中的相关碳足迹计算的相关理论,比较了与开口方法的能耗和碳足迹和在相同条件下的开放式施工方法。此外,分析了不同施工方法对不同因素的敏感性。绘制的主要结论:(1)在大多数情况下,固化的管道方法的能耗低于其他管道修复方法的能耗和碳足迹,受各种设计因素的影响较小。 (2)各种恒星技术具有降低施工能耗和碳足迹,相对于开口方法不同程度。 (3)当施工长度短或深度非常浅时,磁干方法的能量消耗和碳足迹可能高于开口方法。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号