首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Energy production from microalgae biomass: carbon footprint and energy balance
【24h】

Energy production from microalgae biomass: carbon footprint and energy balance

机译:微藻生物质的能源生产:碳足迹和能量平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bioenergy sources are promising alternatives for sustainable energy production. Nevertheless, significant research and detailed analysis are necessary to identify the circumstances under which such energy sources can contribute to sustainability. This paper reviews the literature of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of microalgae-to-energy technologies and focuses in two categories, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and Net Energy Ratios (NER). The analysis is illustrated with a case study of microalgae biomass combustion to produce heat and compares the influence of different electricity sources with respect to GHG emissions and NER along the supply chain. Selected fossil energy sources were used as reference conditions. The methodology was LCA based on ISO 14044 standard, and most of the data used were extracted from a review of relevant scientific publications. Heat production from microalgae showed higher GHG emissions than those from fossil fuels with United States' electricity grid, but lower than those with the Brazilian one. The NER of heat from microalgae combustion life cycle is still disadvantageous compared to most of fossil options. However, the observation that fossil fuel options performed slightly better than microalgae combustion, in the two categories analyzed, must be understood in the context of a mature fossil energy technology chain. The fossil technology has less potential for improvements, while microalgae technology is beginning and has significant potential for additional innovations. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:生物能源是可持续能源生产的有希望的替代方法。但是,需要进行大量研究和详细分析才能确定在何种情况下此类能源可以促进可持续性。本文回顾了微藻类能源技术的生命周期评估(LCA)文献,重点关注温室气体(GHG)排放和净能量比(NER)两类。案例分析以微藻类生物质燃烧产生热量为例进行了说明,并比较了不同电源对整个供应链中温室气体排放和NER的影响。选择的化石能源用作参考条件。该方法是基于ISO 14044标准的LCA,所使用的大多数数据均摘自相关科学出版物的综述。与美国电网的化石燃料相比,微藻类产生的热量显示出更高的温室气体排放,但比巴西的低。与大多数化石方法相比,微藻燃烧生命周期产生的热能仍然不利。然而,必须在成熟的化石能源技术链的背景下理解观察到的两种化石燃料选择的性能略优于微藻燃烧的观察。化石技术的改进潜力较小,而微藻技术正在起步,并且具有进行其他创新的巨大潜力。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号