首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Life cycle based evaluation of harvested rainwater use in toilets and for irrigation
【24h】

Life cycle based evaluation of harvested rainwater use in toilets and for irrigation

机译:基于生命周期的厕所和灌溉雨水收集量评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Harvested rainwater is an alternative water source for buildings, especially for non-potable uses such as irrigation and toilet flushing. While rainwater harvesting is perceived as a sustainable design approach, there is limited information on the environmental and economic performance of this technology. To address this literature gap, life cycle assessment and life cycle costing tools were applied for a dormitory that could potentially use harvested rainwater to flush toilets or to irrigate the lawn. Five scenarios were modeled including a new versus renovated building and irrigation versus toilet flushing water end use. The rainwater cisterns for all the scenarios were sized using the Yield After Spillage approach and long term daily precipitation of Toledo. Energy and greenhouse gas emissions were calculated using Economic Input Output Life Cycle Assessment (for construction phase and energy use by pump) and GaBi (for water and wastewater treatment) databases. The life cycle environmental impacts and costs were estimated and compared to the business as usual scenario, where the water supply demands are met by municipally supplied potable water in a combined or separate sanitary sewer network. It was discovered that energy and greenhouse gas emission payback periods can be achieved for almost every scenario. Yet cost payback periods of implementing harvested rainwater were found to be longer than the life time of the building except for two scenarios: using rainwater for irrigation in a renovation project and using rainwater for toilet flushing in a new construction project. These two scenarios had the lowest cost, energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts among all scenarios modeled. Reducing occupancy to match toilet flushing demand increased the per person impact. However, in general, the per person impacts were much lower than a person's impact from driving or electricity use. While separate sewers divert the stormwater runoff to the water bodies and thereby prevent the environmental problems resulting from combined sewer overflows, a rainwater harvesting system connected to separate sewers was found to reduce the energy and greenhouse gas emissions less than so if the rainwater harvesting system were connected to combined sewers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:收集的雨水是建筑物的替代水源,特别是用于非饮用水用途,例如灌溉和厕所冲洗。尽管雨水收集被认为是一种可持续的设计方法,但是有关该技术在环境和经济方面的信息却很少。为了弥补这一文献空白,将一个生命周期评估和生命周期成本计算工具应用于一个宿舍,该宿舍可能会使用收集到的雨水冲洗厕所或灌溉草坪。对五种情景进行了建模,包括新建建筑与装修建筑,灌溉与厕所冲水的最终用途。使用“溢漏后产量”方法和托莱多的长期日降水量来确定所有方案的雨水储水池的大小。能源和温室气体排放量是使用经济投入产出生命周期评估(用于施工阶段和泵的能源使用)和GaBi(用于水和废水处理)数据库计算的。估算了生命周期对环境的影响和成本,并将其与照常情况进行比较,在常规情况下,供水需求由市政供应的饮用水通过组合或单独的下水道网络来满足。发现几乎在每种情况下都可以实现能源和温室气体排放的回收期。然而,发现采用回收雨水的成本回收期比建筑物的寿命长,除了以下两种情况:在翻新项目中使用雨水灌溉和在新建筑项目中使用雨水冲洗厕所。在所建模的所有方案中,这两种方案的成本,能源和温室气体排放影响最低。减少占用量以适应厕所冲水需求增加了每人的影响。但是,总的来说,人均影响要比开车或用电对人的影响低得多。虽然单独的下水道将雨水径流转移到水体,从而防止了由下水道联合溢流造成的环境问题,但发现与单独的下水道相连的雨水收集系统减少的能量和温室气体排放量要比雨水收集系统少的多。连接到下水道。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号