首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) in Northeast Iran
【24h】

Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) in Northeast Iran

机译:伊朗东北玉米(Zea mays L.)和豆类(Phaseolus vulgaris L)间套作的最佳条带宽度的确定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:间作是作物生产的一种可持续方法,用于最大限度地利用可用资源。这项研究的目标是在2009年和2010年进行,以确定玉米/豆条间作的最佳条幅。在研究中评估的处理方式为2行豆和2行玉米(II),3行豆和3行玉米(III),4行豆和4行玉米(IV),5行豆的不同条宽和间作的贡献5行玉米(V),玉米和豆类单一栽培。 2010年高于平均温度,导致该年农作物减产。气候条件对玉米减产的影响大于玉米。 2009年的辐射吸收,辐射利用效率,生物产量,土地当量比,拥挤系数和系统生产率指数高于2010年。2009年玉米和豆类的辐射利用效率高于2010年(分别为8.9%和17.6%)。与单作系统相比,带间作系统提高了辐射吸收,辐射利用效率,生物产量,土地当量比,拥挤系数和系统生产力指数。带材宽度从2行增加到5行会导致所有测得的标准减少。最佳的带材宽度是使用II和III带材间作处理。间作的生物产量虽然低于单一耕作,但土地当量比提高(1.39和1.37)可提高总土地生产率。这意味着与2009年和2010年相比,单作种植所需的土地要比间作种植的土地分别多39%和37%。因此,证明了套作系统在资源利用方面比单作系统更有效。还似乎以带状方式将每种作物的等效行号3和4排在资源使用上比其他行组合更有希望。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号