首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Will export rebate policy be effective for CO2 emissions reduction in China? A CEEPA-based analysis
【24h】

Will export rebate policy be effective for CO2 emissions reduction in China? A CEEPA-based analysis

机译:出口退税政策对中国减少二氧化碳排放有效吗?基于CEEPA的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

China has adopted cancellation of export tax rebate policies on maily occasions to push ahead energy conservation and emission reduction since 2007. By applying a CEEPA (China Energy 8: Environmental Policy Analysis system) model, this paper simulates the impacts of the cancellation of export rebates on CO2 emissions and socio-economic consequences in different scenarios so as to figure out whether it works. This paper covers three export rebate scenarios and makes comparisons between the impacts of export rebates on emission reduction effects and that of carbon tax policies. The conclusions are: 1) the current policy which cancels export rebates for key sectors can cut emissions at huge economic cost, yet it is unustainable; 2) the policy which cancels export rebates for key sectors and meanwhile subsidizes sectoral outputs yields double dividends in the short term, thus can facilitate emission reduction yet the boost is limited; 3) the policy which cancels export rebates and boosts domestic demand helps improving residents' welfare in the short term while it may inflict pronounced social and economic impacts in the long run. So policy of this kind should be adopted with great caution; 4) export rebates generate far more economic costs than carbon tax policies in the long term, and don't contribute to optimizing the energy mix as well as the latter. In summary, canceling export rebates should not be regarded as a priority to encourage emission reduction. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:自2007年以来,中国在许多场合采取了取消出口退税政策,以推动节能减排。通过应用CEEPA(中国能源8:环境政策分析系统)模型,本文模拟了取消出口退税的影响评估二氧化碳在不同情况下的排放量和社会经济后果,从而确定其是否有效。本文涵盖了三种出口退税方案,并比较了出口退税对减排效果的影响和碳税政策的影响。结论是:1)现行取消重点行业出口退税的政策可以减少排放,但要付出巨大的经济代价,但这是不可持续的。 2)取消重点行业出口退税,同时补贴部门产出的政策在短期内可产生双倍的红利,因此可以促进减排,但增长动力有限; 3)取消出口退税并提高内需的政策在短期内有助于改善居民的福利,而从长远来看可能会对社会和经济产生明显影响。因此,应谨慎采取这种政策; 4)从长远来看,出口退税比碳税政策产生的经济成本高得多,并且对优化能源结构和优化能源结构均无济于事。总之,取消出口退税不应被视为鼓励减排的优先事项。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2015年第15期|120-129|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China|Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Export rebates; CO2 emission reduction; CGE model; Carbon tax;

    机译:出口退税;二氧化碳减排;CGE模型;碳税;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号