...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation - Lessons from the fashion and apparel industry
【24h】

Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation - Lessons from the fashion and apparel industry

机译:供应商评估中的环境和社会标准-服装业的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Due to environmental and social problems with suppliers, companies have included sustainability criteria in their supplier evaluation. However, there is little research on the application of environmental and social criteria and related purchasing practices. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine how companies apply environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation. Interviews with purchasing experts from the fashion and apparel industry were conducted. The results indicate that no child labour, working hours, no forced labour, no discrimination, employment compensation, freedom of association, and health and safety practices are commonly used as social criteria, whereas end-of-pipe control (wastewater treatment systems) and environmentally friendly materials are used as environmental criteria. New criteria, for example, housing conditions and home worker conditions, were identified as not having been suggested in the literature on supplier evaluation. The discussion herein examines the application and the importance of sustainability criteria in the supplier evaluation process. Environmental and social criteria are applied in pre-qualification as well as verification of the compliance of the purchasing requirements in supplier controlling. However, these criteria are not important in the final selection of a supplier for an order as is often recommended in the literature. Consequently, sustainability criteria are indeed important for supplier evaluation but do not carry the same importance that many papers assign them. The research findings contribute to the literature on sustainable supply chain management with empirical insights about the application and importance of environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation. Furthermore, the identified sustainability criteria can be used by practitioners to improve supplier evaluation efforts. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:由于供应商的环境和社会问题,公司已在其供应商评估中纳入了可持续性标准。但是,关于环境和社会标准以及相关采购实践的应用的研究很少。因此,本研究的目的是检验公司如何在供应商评估中应用环境和社会标准。对来自时装和服装业的采购专家进行了采访。结果表明,没有童工,工作时间,没有强迫劳动,没有歧视,没有雇佣补偿,结社自由以及健康和安全实践被普遍用作社会标准,而管道末端控制(废水处理系统)和环保材料被用作环境标准。确定新条件,例如住房条件和家庭工人条件,这在有关供应商评估的文献中并未提出。本文的讨论探讨了供应商评估过程中可持续性标准的应用和重要性。在资格预审中以及在供应商控制中验证采购要求的符合性时,将环境和社会标准应用到环境中。但是,这些标准对于最终选择供应商的订单并不重要,正如文献中经常建议的那样。因此,可持续性标准的确对供应商评估很重要,但是却没有许多论文认为的那么重要。研究结果为有关可持续供应链管理的文献做出了贡献,并具有关于环境和社会标准在供应商评估中的应用和重要性的经验性见解。此外,从业人员可以使用确定的可持续性标准来改善供应商评估工作。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号