...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Integrating anthropogenic material stocks and flows into a modern resource classification framework: Challenges and potentials
【24h】

Integrating anthropogenic material stocks and flows into a modern resource classification framework: Challenges and potentials

机译:将人为材料存量和流量纳入现代资源分类框架:挑战和潜力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In light of various policy initiatives promoting the efficient use of resources, this study investigates how anthropogenic resources could be claisifled under the United Nations Framework Classification for Fossil Energy and Mineral Reserves and Resources 2009 (UNFC-2009). Compared to geogenic resources, anthropogenic deposits are more heterogeneous and subject to various dynamics, due to the human impact on their genesis. Often they must be assessed not only under aspects of resource recovery, but with respect to alternative waste treatment and disposal options. Factors, which are influencing the classification of anthropogenic resources, vary during the individual phases of resource classification, namely prospection, exploration and evaluation. During the (pre)prospection phase, the preconditions defining the setting for the following resource classification are checked, i.e. the deposit's status of availability for mining ("in-use stocks", "obsolete stocks" or "waste flows") as well as the specific handling and mining condition. System variables, which determine the potentially extractable amount of materials, play a major role during the exploration phase, e.g. technological choices for recovery. In the evaluation phase, modifying factors with direct impact on the project's economics are investigated, such as prices for secondary products, (avoided) costs and possibly monetized externalities. Challenges and potentials of classifying different types of anthropogenic resources under UNFC-2009 are illustrated for two different cases: Mining an old landfill (obsolete stock) is contrasted in a qualitative discussion to mining E-waste (waste flow). Finally, an operative evaluation procedure is outlined, which is still to be refined and illustrated via case studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:根据促进有效利用资源的各种政策举措,本研究调查了如何根据《联合国化石能源与矿产储量和资源框架分类2009》(UNFC-2009)来认定人为资源。与地源资源相比,由于人类对其成因的影响,人为沉积物的异质性更高,并且受到各种动力的影响。通常,不仅必须在资源回收方面,而且还要在替代废物处理和处置方案方面对它们进行评估。影响人为资源分类的因素在资源分类的各个阶段(即勘探,勘探和评估)各不相同。在(预)勘探阶段,检查定义以下资源分类设置的前提条件,即,矿床的可开采状态(“使用中的库存”,“过期库存”或“废物流”)以及具体的处理和采矿条件。确定变量的潜在可提取量的系统变量在勘探阶段起着重要作用,例如恢复的技术选择。在评估阶段,研究对项目经济有直接影响的修改因素,例如次级产品的价格,(避免的)成本以及可能的货币化外部性。在两种不同情况下,说明了在UNFC-2009下对不同类型的人为资源进行分类所面临的挑战和潜力:在定性讨论中,将开采旧垃圾填埋场(废弃库存)与开采电子废弃物(废弃物流)进行了对比。最后,概述了手术评估程序,该程序尚需通过案例研究加以完善和说明。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号