首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparing the environmental performance of mixed and specialised dairy farms: the role of the system level analysed
【24h】

Comparing the environmental performance of mixed and specialised dairy farms: the role of the system level analysed

机译:比较混合奶场和专业奶场的环境绩效:分析系统级别的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mixed crop-livestock systems are often considered more environmental friendly compared to specialised systems, but due to the interactions between different farming activities, it is not trivial to quantify possible benefits. Using life cycle assessment (LCA), we tested different allocation procedures and system expansion through avoided burden to compare the environmental impact of milk from either specialised or mixed dairy production systems (product level). In a second approach, we compared the whole farming systems with additive system expansion, where the functional unit comprised milk, live animals sold for meat production and crops (farm level). On the product level, milk from the mixed farm had higher non-renewable cumulative energy demand, terrestrial ecotoxicity and phosphorus use, but lower aquatic eutrophication N, independently of the allocation method. For all other impact categories, differences were not significant. On the farm level, results were partially reversed. The mixed system had a lower energy demand and potassium use, while phosphorus use was higher. All other differences were not significant on farm level. The different rankings on product and on farm level were caused by the way manure was attributed to the farming activities. In order to avoid allocation, manure management was sub-divided into storage and application processes. Storage was attributed to dairy production, application to dairy production only if applied on grassland or feed crops, and to cash crops when applied to produce these crops. Manure applied on cash crop areas was thus out of the scope of the product approach, and mineral fertilisers that could be saved within the cash crop production were thus not attributed to milk production. We conclude that only system expansion was able to cope with the complexity of mixed farming systems in LCA. Based on our results with modelled farms, mixed farming showed the potential to reduce environmental impacts compared to specialised farming. Nevertheless, due to the complexity of the system regarding farm management and interactions between cropping and livestock activities, only an assessment with real farm data could reveal the actual benefits of such systems. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
机译:与专门的系统相比,混合农作物-牲畜系统通常被认为对环境更友好,但是由于不同农业活动之间的相互作用,量化可能的收益并非易事。通过使用生命周期评估(LCA),我们通过避免负担来测试了不同的分配程序和系统扩展,从而比较了来自专用或混合乳制品生产系统(产品级别)的牛奶对环境的影响。在第二种方法中,我们将整个农业系统与附加系统扩展进行了比较,其中功能单元包括牛奶,出售用于肉类生产的活畜和农作物(农场水平)。在产品水平上,与分配方法无关,来自混合农场的牛奶具有较高的不可再生累积能源需求,陆地生态毒性和磷的使用,但水生富营养化氮较低。对于所有其他影响类别,差异并不显着。在农场一级,结果被部分逆转。混合系统的能源需求和钾使用量较低,而磷的使用较高。在农场级别,所有其他差异均不显着。在产品和农场级别上的不同排名是由粪便归因于农业活动的方式造成的。为了避免分配,肥料管理被细分为存储和施用过程。储存归因于乳制品生产,仅当应用于草原或饲料作物时才应用于乳制品生产,而当用于生产这些作物时则归于经济作物。因此,在经济作物区域施用的肥料不在产品方法范围之内,因此,经济作物生产中可节省的矿物肥料不归因于牛奶产量。我们得出的结论是,只有系统扩展才能应对LCA中混合农业系统的复杂性。根据我们对模型化农场的研究结果,与专业化耕作相比,混合耕作显示出减少环境影响的潜力。然而,由于有关农场管理以及作物与牲畜活动之间相互作用的系统的复杂性,只有使用真实农场数据进行的评估才能揭示这种系统的实际收益。 (C)2016作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布。这是CC BY-NC-ND许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)下的开放获取文章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号