...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Analysing the financial efficiency of use of water and energy saving systems in single-family homes
【24h】

Analysing the financial efficiency of use of water and energy saving systems in single-family homes

机译:分析单户住宅中节水和节能系统的财务效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Increasing demand for water and energy sources, accompanied by continued increases in the prices of these sources, has been observed worldwide. This has resulted in the need to seek alternative sources. In response to this statement, a cost-effective analysis has been carried out to enable the use of selected systems to reduce demands for potable water and natural gas used for heating in single-family homes. The study includes the Drain Water Heat Recovery System, Gray Water Harvesting System and Rainwater Harvesting System. The Life Cycle Cost methodology has been applied as a tool for the analysis. Depending on the number of users and rate of piped water consumption the determined Life Cycle Cost indicator ranged from (sic)11519 to (sic)19678. The study has shown that the highest life cycle cost are characteristic of the graywater recycling variant. In circumstances where water consumption in homes for purposes of showering and toilet flushing exceeded 300 L per day, the most cost-effective is the option that combines all systems analyzed. The most preferred, in the other cases was the use of Rainwater Harvesting System. The sensitivity analysis carried out has also shown that costs changes associated with building water supply and sewerage facilities has had the greatest impact on life cycle costs of each solution. The analysis have shown that the systems under consideration could serve as alternatives for traditional installations. Their use has resulted in reductions in the consumption of fossil fuels and natural water resources, thus contributing to environmental improvements. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在世界范围内已经观察到对水和能源的需求不断增加,同时这些水的价格持续上涨。这导致需要寻找替代来源。为了回应这一说法,已经进行了具有成本效益的分析,以使所选系统可以减少对单户住宅供暖所用的饮用水和天然气的需求。研究包括排水热回收系统,灰水收集系统和雨水收集系统。生命周期成本方法已被用作分析工具。根据用户数量和自来水消耗率,确定的生命周期成本指标在(sic)11519至(sic)19678之间。研究表明,最高的生命周期成本是灰水回收变体的特征。如果每天用于淋浴和厕所冲水的家庭用水量超过300升,则最经济的选择就是结合所有已分析系统的选件。在其他情况下,最优选的是使用雨水收集系统。进行的敏感性分析还显示,与建筑物供水和污水处理设施相关的成本变化对每种解决方案的生命周期成本影响最大。分析表明,所考虑的系统可以作为传统安装的替代方案。它们的使用减少了化石燃料和天然水资源的消耗,从而有助于改善环境。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号