...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >A methodology to assess China's building energy savings at the national level: An IPAT-LMDI model approach
【24h】

A methodology to assess China's building energy savings at the national level: An IPAT-LMDI model approach

机译:在国家一级评估中国建筑节能的方法:IPAT-LMDI模型方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

National building energy savings (NBES) plays an essential role in policymaking of China's building energy-efficiency (BEE) work. Numerous factors, such as technological progress and users' behavior, affect NBES while most of them are unquantifiable. One missing possibility along this direction is that there is currently no method to calculate China's NBES by summarizing all driving factors. To arrive at a solution, we proposed a concept of comparable building energy consumption per unit area and a method of China's NBES calculation based on an extended version of IPAT model (I = PAT, I = Human Impact, P = Population, A = Affluence, T = Technology) and LMDI decomposition (Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index, LMDI). Calculation revealed that China's NBES in "The 10th Five Year Plan" period (2001-2005), "The 11th Five Year Plan" period (2006-2010), and the first four years of "The 12th Five Year Plan" period (2011-2014) was 165, 158, and 127 million tce, respectively. Based on these calculation results, we checked NBES data then successfully proved the validity of this calculation method. Furthermore, after comparing the calculated NBES with the official planned NBES, we found that China surpassed its BEE targets. In the third stage of China's BEE work (2006-2015), the implementation of BEE policies obtained good results. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:国家建筑节能(NBES)在中国建筑节能(BEE)工作的政策制定中起着至关重要的作用。 NBES受到许多因素(例如技术进步和用户行为)的影响,而其中大多数是无法量化的。沿着这个方向的一种可能的缺失是,目前没有一种方法可以通过汇总所有驱动因素来计算中国的NBES。为了找到解决方案,我们提出了一个可比的单位面积建筑能耗概念,并基于IPAT模型的扩展版本(I = PAT,I =对人类的影响,P =人口,A =富裕度)提出了中国的NBES计算方法。 ,T =技术)和LMDI分解(对数平均Divisia指数,LMDI)。经计算,中国的NBES处于“第十个五年计划”时期(2001- 2005年),“第十一个五年计划”时期(2006- 2010年)和“第十二个五年计划”时期的前四年(2011年) -2014)分别为165、158和1.27亿标准箱。根据这些计算结果,我们检查了NBES数据,然后成功证明了该计算方法的有效性。此外,在将计算得出的NBES与官方计划的NBES进行比较之后,我们发现中国超出了其BEE目标。在中国BEE工作的第三阶段(2006-2015年),BEE政策的实施取得了良好的效果。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号