...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >The effects of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emission taxes: An empirical study in China
【24h】

The effects of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emission taxes: An empirical study in China

机译:二氧化碳,甲烷和一氧化二氮排放税的影响:中国的一项实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

China has become the largest producer of carbon dioxide (CO2) and non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions in the world. However, almost all current Chinese policies are emphasizing the control of CO2 emissions only, and no goals have been established for non-CO2 greenhouse gas emission reductions, China risks missing early opportunities for lower-cost abatement of the latter. Aiming to disclose the different effects of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions reductions and provide some suggestions for non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions reduction in China, this paper focuses on identifying the price impacts and transmitting paths among different sectors of imposing CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) emission taxes using the Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) model, then further compares the sources of CO2 and non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions based on the big data from the first national census of pollution sources. When the same emission tax is imposed for every ton of CO(2)e, the results clearly show that the prices in all sectors have the greatest increase for CO2 emissions tax scenario relative to CH4 and N2O emissions tax scenarios. With respect to sectors with larger CH4 and N2O emissions, price change in sectors with larger CO2 emissions will be responsible for the price change of almost all sectors. Moreover, from the perspective of sources of CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions, CO2 emissions are from almost all industries of the entire economy, and CH4 and N2O emissions are from agriculture, energy mining, and waste. These results indicate that the tax reducing CH4 and N2O emissions will cause lower impacts than the abatement of CO2 emissions. Integrating the current national policies with the above results, Chinese government should also pay more attention to CH4 and N2O emission reduction. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:中国已成为世界上最大的二氧化碳(CO2)和非二氧化碳温室气体排放国。但是,中国目前几乎所有的政策都只强调控制二氧化碳的排放,还没有为减少非二氧化碳温室气体的排放量制定目标,中国冒着丧失早期降低后者成本的机会。为了揭示二氧化碳和非二氧化碳温室气体减排的不同影响,并为中国减少非二氧化碳温室气体的排放提供一些建议,本文着重于确定价格影响以及施加二氧化碳,甲烷的不同行业之间的传导途径。 (CH4),一氧化二氮(N2O)排放税,然后使用社会核算矩阵(SAM)模型,然后根据第一次全国污染源普查的大数据进一步比较了CO2和非CO2温室气体的排放源。当对每吨CO(2)e征收相同的排放税时,结果清楚地表明,相对于CH4和N2O排放税方案,所有部门的价格对CO2排放税方案的涨幅最大。对于CH4和N2O排放量较大的行业,CO2排放量较大的行业的价格变化将导致几乎所有行业的价格变化。而且,从CO2,CH4和N2O排放源的角度来看,CO2排放来自整个经济的几乎所有行业,CH4和N2O排放来自农业,能源开采和废物。这些结果表明,减少税收中的CH4和N2O排放所产生的影响要比减少CO2排放所产生的影响小。将当前的国家政策与上述结果相结合,中国政府还应更加重视CH4和N2O的减排。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号