...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >A review of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of commonly used ex-situ soil treatment technologies
【24h】

A review of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of commonly used ex-situ soil treatment technologies

机译:常用异地土壤处理技术的生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

GHG emissions are important footprints because of increasing concern over climate change. Remediation methods produces GHGs in varying quantities based on which activities are involved through its entire life cycle and which contaminants are present, often because some contaminants are more difficult to remove from soil than others. Accounting for emissions from all phases of the project requires a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach. LCA can help in choosing the best available technology to reduce the environmental burden of the remediation technology or to improve the sustainability of the technology by implementing systematic approaches to ensure that future developments are optimized for environmental performance throughout the life cycle. The primary objective of this paper is to review existing LCA studies that report GHG emissions (CO2-eq) or Global warming potential (GWP) from six ex situ soil remediation technologies (ESRTs), including excavation and disposal, ex-situ thermal desorption, ex-situ soil vapor extraction, ex-situ bioremediation, excavation and incineration, and soil washing, and present the variability in GHG/GWP results and how this data can help in selecting an ex-situ soil remediation technology with a lower global warming potential. A second objective of this study is to compare the GWP levels of ex-situ remediation to the GWP levels of typical in situ remediation methods. Our results showed a large variation in GHG emissions of treated soil from six ESRTs varying from 3.1 x 10(-7) t to 8.2 t CO2-eq/m(3). Incineration had the highest mean GHG emissions (0.7 t CO2-eq/m(3)) and thermal desorption the lowest (0.07 t CO2-eq/m(3)). It was also found that there was a large variation range of GHG emissions from the ex-situ excavation and disposal method soil treatment technologies, varying from 3.1 x 10(-7) t to 8.2 t CO2-eq/m(3) of treated soil. This knowledge provides opportunities to increase sustainability of soil remediation throughout the investigation, design, construction, operation, and monitoring phases of site remediation regardless of the selected cleanup remedy. This shows data on LCA GHGs are useful to assess the impact of different scenarios and management practices on ESRTs. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:温室气体排放是重要的足迹,因为人们越来越关注气候变化。补救方法会根据其整个生命周期中涉及的活动和存在的污染物而产生不同数量的温室气体,这通常是因为某些污染物比其他污染物更难从土壤中清除。对项目各个阶段的排放进行核算需要使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法。 LCA可以通过实施系统的方法来确保未来的发展针对整个生命周期的环境绩效进行优化,从而帮助选择最佳的可用技术以减轻补救技术的环境负担或提高技术的可持续性。本文的主要目的是审查现有的LCA研究,这些研究报告了六种异地土壤修复技术(ESRT)的温室气体排放量(CO2-eq)或全球变暖潜力(GWP),包括挖掘和处置,异地热解吸,异地土壤蒸汽提取,异地生物修复,挖掘和焚化以及土壤洗涤,并介绍了温室气体/全球升温潜能值的变化,以及该数据如何帮助选择具有较低全球变暖潜力的异地土壤修复技术。这项研究的第二个目标是比较异位修复的GWP水平与典型的原位修复方法的GWP水平。我们的结果表明,从3.1 x 10(-7)t到8.2 t CO2-eq / m(3)的六个ESRT,处理过的土壤的温室气体排放量存在很大差异。焚烧的平均GHG排放量最高(0.7 t CO2-eq / m(3)),热脱附的最低(0.07 t CO2-eq / m(3))。还发现,异地开挖和处置方法的土壤处理技术产生的温室气体排放差异很大,从3.1 x 10(-7)t到8.2 t CO2-eq / m(3)不等。泥。无论选择哪种清除补救措施,该知识都为提高整地调查,设计,建造,运营和监测阶段的土壤修复可持续性提供了机会。这表明有关LCA温室气体的数据对于评估不同方案和管理实践对ESRT的影响很有用。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号