首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Bamboo vs. crops: An integrated emergy and economic evaluation of using bamboo to replace crops in south Sichuan Province, China
【24h】

Bamboo vs. crops: An integrated emergy and economic evaluation of using bamboo to replace crops in south Sichuan Province, China

机译:竹与农作物:在中国四川省南部使用竹代替农作物的综合能值和经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on long-term monitoring conducted in Chang-ning county, a pilot site of the Grain for Green Program (GFGP), an integrated emergy and economic method was applied to evaluate the dynamic ecological-economic performance of 3 kinds of bamboo systems planted on sloping farmland. The results confirmed the positive effects of all 3 kinds of bamboo systems on water conservation and soil erosion control. The benefits gained progressively increased during the first 8 years after conversion, going from 4639 to 16127 EMyuan/ha/yr on average. All three bamboo plantations were much more sustainable than common sloping cropland (CP) at both the short and long-term scales with their Emergy Sustainability Index (ESI) and Emergy Index for Sustainable Development (EISD), respectively, being 14.07-325.71 and 80.35-265.80 times that of CP. However, all three bamboo plantations had a Net Economic Benefit (NEB) less than that of CP during the first 8 years after conversion. Even with the government mandated ecological compensation applied, the annual NEBECS of the Bambusa rigida (BR) and Phyllostachys pubescense (PP) plantations was, respectively, 3922.03 and 7422.77yuan/ha/yr lower than the NEB of CP. Emergy-based evaluation of ecosystem services provides an objective reference for applying ecological compensation in strategy making, but it cannot wholly solve the economic viability problem faced by all bamboo plantations. Inter-planting annual herbs or edible fungus, such as Dictyophora echinovolvata, within bamboo forests, especially in young bamboo plantations, might be a direction for optimizing bamboo cultivation that would improve its economic viability. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在长宁县进行的长期监测的基础上,该县是“退耕还林工程”的试点,采用能值和经济综合方法评估了种植在该处的3种竹子系统的动态生态经济绩效。倾斜的农田。结果证实了所有三种竹系统对节水和水土流失防治的积极作用。在转换后的头8年中,获得的收益逐渐增加,平均从4639 EMyuan / ha / yr变为16127 EMyuan / ha / yr。在短期和长期尺度上,这三个竹林都比普通坡耕地(CP)更具可持续性,其能效可持续性指数(ESI)和能效可持续发展指数(EISD)分别为14.07-325.71和80.35。 CP的-265.80倍。但是,在转换后的前8年中,这三个竹林的净经济效益(NEB)均小于CP。即使采用了政府规定的生态补偿措施,印度硬毛竹和毛竹人工林的年度NEBECS也分别比CP的NEB低3922.03和7422.77元/公顷/年。基于能值的生态系统服务评价为将生态补偿应用于战略制定提供了客观的参考,但不能完全解决所有人工林面临的经济可行性问题。在竹林中,特别是在年轻的竹林中,间种一年生草本植物或食用真菌,例如棘皮D Dictyophora echinovolvata,可能是优化竹林种植以提高其经济生存能力的方向。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2018年第10期|464-473|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, South China Bot Garden, Key Lab Vegetat Restorat & Management Degraded Ec, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    Int Ctr Bamboo & Rattan, Key Lab Sci & Technol Bamboo & Rattan, Beijing 100102, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, South China Bot Garden, Key Lab Vegetat Restorat & Management Degraded Ec, Guangzhou 510650, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Atlantic Ecol Div, 27 Tarzwell Dr, Narragansett, RI USA;

    Int Ctr Bamboo & Rattan, Key Lab Sci & Technol Bamboo & Rattan, Beijing 100102, Peoples R China;

    Int Ctr Bamboo & Rattan, Key Lab Sci & Technol Bamboo & Rattan, Beijing 100102, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Grain for Green Program; Emergy; Bamboo; Soil erosion; Ecological compensation;

    机译:退耕还林工程;能源;竹;水土流失;生态补偿;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号