首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Projecting the future impacts of China's cropland balance policy on ecosystem services under the shared socioeconomic pathways
【24h】

Projecting the future impacts of China's cropland balance policy on ecosystem services under the shared socioeconomic pathways

机译:在共同的社会经济路径下预测中国耕地平衡政策对生态系统服务的未来影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

China has implemented a strict policy of cropland balance to reduce the impacts of built-up land expansion on food production. However, this policy only alleviates the quantitative loss of cropland, while exerting unexpected damages to ecosystem services. Given that China's built-up land will continue to expand in the foreseeable future, the evaluation of potential ecological cost of obtaining a cropland balance is important to help seeking a sustainable strategy for cropland protection. To address this issue, this study develops a cellular automaton model to conduct multiple scenario simulations under the assumptions of shared socioeconomic pathways. The results reveal the inferior physical condition of the reclaimed cropland for compensation. Despite the quantity balance achieved, the lost productivity is compensated by only 28-31%. If the lost productivity is intended to be fully offset, however, the amounts of reclaimed cropland should be more than double, leading to substantial declines in ecosystem services. These findings suggest the failure of the current cropland balance policy, because either the lost cropland or productivity had to be compensated at a high cost of ecological declines. The results also imply that upgrading the quality of remaining cropland is more important than maintaining the quantity balance. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:中国已经实施了严格的耕地平衡政策,以减少耕地扩张对粮食生产的影响。但是,该政策仅减轻了耕地的数量损失,同时对生态系统服务造成了意想不到的损害。鉴于中国的土地建成面积将在可预见的将来继续扩大,因此评估获得耕地平衡的潜在生态成本对于帮助寻求可持续的耕地保护战略至关重要。为了解决这个问题,本研究开发了一种细胞自动机模型,可以在共享社会经济途径的假设下进行多种情景模拟。结果表明,退耕还林地的物理条件较差。尽管实现了数量平衡,但是生产力损失仅能补偿28-31%。但是,如果打算完全弥补生产力损失,开垦的耕地数量应增加一倍以上,从而导致生态系统服务大幅下降。这些发现表明,当前的耕地平衡政策失败了,因为必须以高昂的生态衰退代价来补偿失去的耕地或生产力。结果还暗示,提高剩余耕地的质量比维持数量平衡更为重要。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号