...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >CO_2 utilization from power plant: A comparative techno-economic assessment of soda ash production and scrubbing by monoethanolamine
【24h】

CO_2 utilization from power plant: A comparative techno-economic assessment of soda ash production and scrubbing by monoethanolamine

机译:电厂CO_2的利用:纯碱生产和单乙醇胺洗涤的技术经济比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CO2 utilization for soda ash production via sodium hydroxide (NaOH) route was compared with the conventional CO2 scrubbing via monoethanolamine (MEA) route for the first time. The techno-economic and sustainability implications of these routes were assessed and compared; CO2 was considered to be captured from a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant. Process equipment were designed and sized from the estimation and simulation of process materials and energy requirements. Capital expenditure (CAPEX), cost of electricity (CoE), cost of CO2 avoided (CoA), and operational expenditure (OPEX) were estimated to compare the economic viability of the NaOH and MEA processes. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of soda ash and NaOH prices on the process economics. Significant energy savings would be achieved from the NaOH process because this process eliminates the solvent regeneration and CO2 compression steps associated with the MEA process. The electricity requirement of the NaOH process was 35 kWh/t CO2, which was only 7% of the electricity requirement of the MEA process. NaOH process showed a total CAPEX of M$ 99.31 and an OPEX of M$ 18.68; this CAPEX was only 65% of that of the MEA scrubbing process. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of CO2 capture would be offset at a soda ash selling price of 18 $/t. NaOH process offers higher sustainability potential for CO2 utilization because it reduces the parasitic energy requirements and high initial capital cost associated with MEA scrubbing process. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:首次将通过氢氧化钠(NaOH)路线生产纯碱所用的CO2与通过单乙醇胺(MEA)路线进行常规CO2洗涤进行了比较。评估并比较了这些路线对技术经济和可持续性的影响;二氧化碳被认为是从天然气联合循环(NGCC)发电厂捕获的。根据对过程材料和能源需求的估算和模拟来设计和确定过程设备的大小。估计了资本支出(CAPEX),电力成本(CoE),避免的CO2成本(CoA)和运营支出(OPEX),以比较NaOH和MEA工艺的经济可行性。进行了敏感性分析,以调查纯碱和NaOH价格对工艺经济性的影响。 NaOH工艺可节省大量能源,因为该工艺省去了与MEA工艺相关的溶剂再生和CO2压缩步骤。 NaOH工艺的电力需求为35 kWh / t CO2,仅为MEA工艺的电力需求的7%。氢氧化钠工艺的总资本支出为99.31马币,运营支出为18.68马币;该CAPEX仅为MEA洗涤过程的6%。敏感性分析表明,纯碱的售价为18美元/吨时,二氧化碳的捕集成本将被抵消。 NaOH工艺提供了更高的二氧化碳利用可持续性潜力,因为它减少了与MEA洗涤工艺相关的寄生能量需求和较高的初始投资成本。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号