首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles addressing capacity fade
【24h】

Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles addressing capacity fade

机译:电动汽车锂离子电池的寿命比较评估,解决容量衰减问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Lithium-ion batteries are currently used in electric vehicles (EVs) with many advantages; however, batteries contribute significantly to the life cycle environmental impacts of these vehicles. This article presents a comparative life cycle assessment of two types of batteries - lithium manganese oxide (LiMn2O4) and lithium ion phosphate (LiFePO4) - frequently used in EVs, addressing real -life operational conditions and battery capacity fade. The influence of the location of battery manufacturing and vehicle charging (electricity mix) was also assessed. A life cycle model of batteries in an EV with a service life of 200 000 km (functional unit) was implemented to assess Primary Fossil Energy, Global Warming, Acidification, and Eutrophication impacts. Moreover, the environmental performance of EVs considering both battery types was evaluated. The LiFePO4 battery had better operational performance than the LiMn2O4 one and fewer batteries were needed over the EV service life. Conversely, the life cycle impacts of the LiFePO4 batteries were higher than the LiMn2O4 ones mainly due to higher manufacturing impacts. In countries with a mix based on renewable electricity, the battery production is the most important contributor to impacts, while in countries with electricity mostly from fossil sources, the use phase is the most important. For both battery types and most impact categories, the environmental impacts of EVs were highly dependent on the usage scenario and the electricity mix used for charging. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:锂离子电池目前在电动汽车(EV)中使用,具有许多优势。然而,电池对这些车辆的生命周期环境影响做出了重大贡献。本文介绍了两种类型的电池的比较寿命周期评估-锰酸锂(LiMn2O4)和磷酸锂离子(LiFePO4)-经常在电动汽车中使用,解决了实际运行条件和电池容量衰减的问题。还评估了电池制造地点和车辆充电(混合电)的影响。为了评估化石能源,全球变暖,酸化和富营养化的影响,实施了电动汽车电池的生命周期模型,其使用寿命为20万公里(功能单位)。此外,评估了考虑两种电池类型的电动汽车的环境性能。 LiFePO4电池比LiMn2O4具有更好的运行性能,并且在EV使用寿命内需要的电池更少。相反,LiFePO4电池的寿命周期影响高于LiMn2O4电池,这主要是由于更高的制造影响。在以可再生电力为基础的国家中,电池生产是影响的最重要因素,而在电力主要来自化石能源的国家中,使用阶段最为重要。对于电池类型和影响最大的类别,电动汽车对环境的影响在很大程度上取决于使用场景和用于充电的电力结构。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2019年第20期|787-794|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Coimbra, Dept Mech Engn, ADAI, LAETA, Polo 2 Campus,R Luis Reis Santos, P-3030788 Coimbra, Portugal;

    Univ Coimbra, Dept Mech Engn, ADAI, LAETA, Polo 2 Campus,R Luis Reis Santos, P-3030788 Coimbra, Portugal;

    Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Chem Engn, Polytech Sch, Ave Prof Lineu Prestes 580,Bloco 18 Conjunto Quim, BR-05424970 Sao Paulo, Brazil;

    Univ Coimbra, Dept Mech Engn, ADAI, LAETA, Polo 2 Campus,R Luis Reis Santos, P-3030788 Coimbra, Portugal;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Electric vehicle (EV); Capacity fade; Environmental impacts; Lithium-ion batteries; LCA;

    机译:电动汽车(EV);容量衰减;环境影响;锂离子电池;LCA;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号