首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Application of life cycle assessment in municipal solid waste management: A worldwide critical review
【24h】

Application of life cycle assessment in municipal solid waste management: A worldwide critical review

机译:生命周期评估在城市固体废物管理中的应用:全球性的严格审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The whopping increase in solid waste generation all over the world calls for the development of waste management strategies for a sustainable environment. By the quantification of environmental impacts, life cycle assessment (LCA) tool can help in answering the call. It evaluates the environmental performance of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) system which helps decision-maker in selecting the best management strategy with minimum impacts on the environment. But, up to what extent the LCA methodology can be applied to MSWM systems? To address this question, the present study analyzed the 153 LCA studies published till date since 2013 all over the world. The present study analyzed the time evolution, geographical distribution, and methodology applied in LCA studies. It summarized the use of the functional unit, LCA model, Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) method, MSWM options, and the critical findings of the selected LCAs, along with MSW composition, income group, and the gaps in the application of the studies. For evaluating the dependence of publication of studies and country's economic condition, the countries in which LCA studies were conducted are classified into four groups on the basis of income level viz., lower income, lower middle income, upper middle income, and higher income countries. In terms of technological coverage, 1 ton of MSW was the most used functional unit. SimaPro was the majorly used LCA model while 56 of the total studies didn't mention about the use of LCA model, only 66 of the total studies included sensitivity analysis in the assessment. Integrated solid waste management was found to be the most preferred waste management option. Also, a very limited number of studies have included life cycle costing and social aspects of MSWM system. The results indicated that the majority of the LCA studies are based in Europe and Asia. Shockingly, 178 out of the total countries in the world have not published a single LCA study on MSWM since 2013. Also, it was found that the effect of increasing Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the publication of LCA studies is irrelevant, possible reasons being the lack of data, time and economic constraints. Establishment of environment-friendly policies and initiatives by the Government along with the participation of public, non-government and private organizations through training courses and seminars might help in improving the LCA applicability in the field of MSWM. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:全世界固体废物产生的惊人增长要求为可持续环境制定废物管理策略。通过量化环境影响,生命周期评估(LCA)工具可以帮助您接听电话。它评估了城市固体废物管理(MSWM)系统的环境绩效,该系统可帮助决策者选择对环境的影响最小的最佳管理策略。但是,LCA方法可在多大程度上应用于MSWM系统?为了解决这个问题,本研究分析了自2013年以来迄今为止在全球发布的153篇LCA研究。本研究分析了时间演化,地理分布和应用于LCA研究的方法。它总结了功能单元,LCA模型,生命周期影响评估(LCIA)方法,MSWM选项的使用以及所选LCA的关键发现,以及MSW组成,收入群体和研究应用中的差距。为了评估研究发表的依赖性和国家的经济状况,进行LCA研究的国家根据收入水平,即低收入,中低收入,中高收入和高收入国家分为四类。就技术覆盖率而言,1吨城市固体废弃物是使用最多的功能单元。 SimaPro是主要使用的LCA模型,而全部研究中有56个没有提及LCA模型的使用,只有66个研究中的敏感性分析包括在评估中。综合固体废物管理被认为是最优选的废物管理选择。而且,非常有限的研究包括MSWM系统的生命周期成本和社会方面。结果表明,大多数LCA研究均位于欧洲和亚洲。令人震惊的是,自2013年以来,全球178个国家中没有发布过有关MSWM的任何LCA研究。此外,还发现,增加国内生产总值(GDP)对LCA研究的发表是无关紧要的,可能是原因缺乏数据,时间和经济限制。政府制定环境友好型政策和倡议,以及公共,非政府和私人组织通过培训课程和讨论会的参与,可能有助于改善生命周期管理在生活垃圾管理领域的适用性。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号