首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Sustainability analysis of landfilling and composting-landfilling for municipal solid waste management in the north of Iran
【24h】

Sustainability analysis of landfilling and composting-landfilling for municipal solid waste management in the north of Iran

机译:伊朗北部城市生活垃圾管理的填埋和堆肥掩埋的可持续性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study evaluates the energy use, exergy demand and the main hot spots of two municipal solid waste (MSW) management scenarios including landfilling (100% landfilling) and composting-landfilling (48% composting, 50.5% landfilling, 1.5% recycling), available in Rasht, Iran. The functional unit was defined as 100 t MSW. The system boundaries encompassed activities ranging from MSW collection in the city up to MSW burial in the landfill and delivery of compost and recyclable materials to the market. For quantifying the environmental impacts, 11 impact categories were analyzed using life cycle assessment methodology, and the outcomes of characterization and normalization of impact categories were interpreted. The results showed that total energy consumption for composting-landfilling was greater than that of landfilling (22.5 vs. 17.5 GI/100tMSW). Composting-landfilling scenario showed avoided environmental emissions in the forms of abiotic depletion, terrestrial ecotoxicity and freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity associated with the production of compost; moreover, global warming potential, human toxicity, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, photochemical oxidation and acidification of landfilling scenario were found to be higher than those of composting-landfilling scenario by 495%, 239%, 49%, 679% and 669%, respectively.' On the other hand, compostingLlandfilling scenario had higher fossil fuels abiotic depletion, ozone layer depletion and eutrophication potential. Transportation accounted for the highest contribution to overall environmental emissions in both of the investigated scenarios, demonstrating the importance of decreasing environmental burdens during this step. Overall, compared to landfilling scenario, the lower environmental burdens associated with composting-landfilling scenario make it more environmentally attractive. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究评估了两种城市固体废物(MSW)管理方案的能源使用,火用需求和主要热点,包括填埋(100%垃圾填埋)和堆肥-填埋(48%堆肥,50.5%垃圾填埋,1.5%回收)可用在伊朗的拉什特。功能单元定义为100 t MSW。系统范围包括从城市收集城市生活垃圾到垃圾填埋场中的城市生活垃圾掩埋,以及将堆肥和可回收材料运送到市场的活动。为了量化环境影响,使用生命周期评估方法分析了11种影响类别,并解释了影响类别的表征和标准化结果。结果表明,堆肥掩埋的总能耗大于掩埋(22.5 vs. 17.5 GI / 100tMSW)。堆肥掩埋的情景表明,与堆肥生产相关的非生物消耗,陆地生态毒性和淡水水生生态毒性形式避免了环境排放;此外,发现填埋场的全球变暖潜能,人类毒性,海洋水生生态毒性,光化学氧化和酸化分别比堆肥-填埋场高495%,239%,49%,679%和669%。 '另一方面,堆肥填埋方案具有更高的化石燃料非生物消耗,臭氧层消耗和富营养化潜力。在这两个调查情景中,运输对总体环境排放的贡献最大,表明在此步骤中减轻环境负担的重要性。总体而言,与垃圾填埋场相比,与堆肥填埋场相关的环境负担较低,这使其在环境方面更具吸引力。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号