首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese political science >Steve Chan, China, the U.S., and the Power-Transition Theory: A Critique
【24h】

Steve Chan, China, the U.S., and the Power-Transition Theory: A Critique

机译:史蒂夫·陈(Steve Chan),中国,美国和权力转移理论:批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The rise of China and its consequences for the international system have been the subject of much debate among IR scholars over the past few years. In this book, Steve Chan offers a timely contribution to this debate by analyzing the rise of China through a critique of the key tenets of power-transition theory (PST). Chan refuses to treat the case of China's ascent as a special and unique event. Instead, he uses this case to support the main argument he makes, which is the central contribution of this volume. In short, the author criticizes the main assertions of PST and uses the rise of China and its alleged threat to the US as the main analytical tool to make his point. Chan's methodological approach draws from historical analogies and from the use of several IR mid-level theories. Chan's main problem with PST is the latter's central argument that revisionist states dissatisfied with the prevailing status quo are likely to start war with the hegemon. Chan argues this is a flawed assumption and that it is the anxious declining hegemon seeking to maintain its position which actually is more likely to launch a war against a rising latecomer. He supports this claim through the use of rationalist and prospective theories of decision choice. He further buttresses it with evidence from the Soviet Union's behavior towards Germany as well as an exploration of China's strategic goals.
机译:在过去的几年中,中国的崛起及其对国际体系的影响一直是国际关系学者们争论的主题。在这本书中,史蒂夫·陈(Steve Chan)通过对权力过渡理论(PST)的关键原则进行了评论,分析了中国的崛起,为这一辩论做出了及时的贡献。 Chan拒绝将中国的上升案视为特殊事件。相反,他使用这种情况来支持他提出的主要论点,这是本卷的核心贡献。简而言之,作者批评了PST的主要主张,并以中国的崛起及其所谓的对美国的威胁为主要分析工具来论证。 Chan的方法论方法源于历史类比和多种IR中层理论的使用。 Chan提出PST的主要问题是后者的中心论点,即对现行现状感到不满的修正主义国家很可能与霸权展开战争。 Chan认为这是一个错误的假设,并且是寻求保持其地位的急于下降的霸权,实际上更有可能向后起之秀发动战争。他通过使用理性主义和前瞻性的决策理论来支持这一主张。他进一步证明了苏联对德国的行为以及对中国战略目标的探索。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Chinese political science》 |2009年第1期|p.111-112|共2页
  • 作者

    Ramon Pacheco Pardo;

  • 作者单位

    International Relations Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:39:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号