首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese political science >Challenging Privatization: A Conceptual and Theoretical Argument
【24h】

Challenging Privatization: A Conceptual and Theoretical Argument

机译:挑战私有化:概念和理论上的争论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is the second of a three-part polemic against the destruction of state owned enterprises in China (the first, "Against Privatization: A Historical and Empirical Argument", is published in JCPS 13:1, 2008). It critically examines the ideology of privatization and argues for alternative guidelines of reform. The central contention is that a healthy market economy does not require domination of private property; rather it relies on apposite political-legal-ideological power and regulatory-monitoring regimes of accumulation and distribution socially legitimated within a given public culture. Rejecting the fallacies of ownership determinism and precision requirement on property rights for morality and efficiency, this essay clarifies distinction between the notion of exclusive properties and the vision of their socialized utility and management. Justifications for reforming state and private sectors alike in accordance with a unifying commons of social defense and feasibilities of innovative reform measures and policy proposals in that direction, will be elaborated in a third essay titled "Overcoming Privatization: A Strategic and Institutional Argument".
机译:这是针对中国破坏国有企业的三部分论争的第二篇(第一篇,“反对私有化:历史和经验论证”,发表于JCPS 13:1,2008年)。它批判性地考察了私有化的思想,并提出了可供选择的改革指导方针。中心论点是,健康的市场经济不需要统治私有财产。相反,它依赖于在给定的公共文化中在社会上合法的积累和分配的适当的政治法律意识形态力量和监管监督制度。拒绝所有权确定性的谬误和对道德的道德要求和效率的精确要求,本文阐明了专有财产的概念与社会化效用和管理的愿景之间的区别。根据题为“克服私有化:战略和制度论点”的第三篇文章,将详细阐述根据统一的社会防御共同体以及创新性改革措施和政策建议在该方向上的可行性改革国有和私营部门的理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号