首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology >Sand Cleanouts With Coiled Tubing: Choice of Process, Tools and Fluids
【24h】

Sand Cleanouts With Coiled Tubing: Choice of Process, Tools and Fluids

机译:连续油管清理沙土:工艺,工具和流体的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Cleaning fill from wellbores is the most common coiled tubing (CT) application. The process is a function of multiple variables including fluid properties, flow velocities, wellbore geometry and deviation, pipe eccentricity, particle properties, fill penetration rate and wiper trip speed. Removing fill from wells with low bottom hole pressures (BHP) can be challenging especially if wells are completed with smaller diameter production tubu-lars which significantly reduce circulation flow cross-section and choke flow. Such challenges are further compounded by high deviation or horizontal well trajectories especially in large diameter wellbores.rnA variety of cleanout methods have been developed in the past, often incorporating high circulation rates, special fluids, wiper trips, or reverse circulation to remove solids. Many of these conventional sand cleanout methods often apply excess hydrostatic pressure on the formation, resulting in lost circulation in pressure depleted reservoirs. The conventional solution to overcome excess hydrostatic pressure has been to include nitrogen to reduce fluid density and thus lessen the hydrostatic head; however, sand vacuuming technology using a concentric coiled tubing (CCT) with a downhole jet pump is an alternative technique for removing fill without placing a hydrostatic load on the reservoir.rnThis paper reviews the individual sand cleanout systems and discusses the advantages and limitations related to each method. In recent years, cleaning sand using the wiper trip method has become the preferred technique. However, an appropriate pump rate and reservoir pressure are needed to maintain a proper return flow rate to carry the sands to the surface. For pressure-depleted reservoirs completed with horizontal wells, a sand vacuuming system can be used to efficiently remove the debris without circulating nitrogen and without high pump rates. When the fill cannot be removed from large-diameter deviated wellbores using conventional low-cost cleanout fluids, then fluids with high solids suspension capability (under shear conditions) in conjunction with wiper tripping may be an economical option. The main application for the reverse circulation technique is cleaning sand from large diameter wellbores when the necessary pump rates for conventional "forward" circulation are not achievable. A venturi junk bailer is often used to retrieve larger or heavier material which cannot be circulated out by traditional methods. Field cases are provided, demonstrating how to select the proper cleaning method and how to efficiently remove sand from a well-bore based on both operational and logistical conditions.
机译:清洗井眼中的填充物是最常见的连续油管(CT)应用。该过程是多个变量的函数,包括流体属性,流速,井眼几何形状和偏差,管道偏心率,颗粒属性,填充渗透率和刮水器跳闸速度。从井底压力低(BHP)的井中清除填充物可能是一个挑战,特别是如果井中的井口直径较小,则可显着减小循环流量横截面和节流流量。高偏差或水平井轨迹(尤其是在大直径井眼中)会进一步加剧这些挑战。过去已经开发了多种清除方法,通常采用高循环速率,特殊流体,刮水器行程或反向循环来去除固体。许多这些常规的砂清除方法通常在地层上施加过大的静水压力,从而导致压力不足的储层中的循环损失。克服过大的静水压力的常规方法是加入氮气以降低流体密度,从而减小静水压头。但是,使用同心螺旋油管(CCT)和井下喷射泵进行砂子吸尘技术是一种无需在储层上施加静水负荷即可去除填充物的替代技术。本文回顾了各个砂子清除系统,并讨论了与之相关的优点和局限性每种方法。近年来,使用刮水器脱扣法清洁沙子已成为首选技术。然而,需要适当的泵送速率和储层压力以维持适当的回流速率以将沙子运送到地面。对于水平井完井的压力降低的储层,可以使用抽砂系统有效地清除碎屑,而无需循环氮气和不增加泵速。当使用常规的低成本清洗液无法从大直径斜井中除去填充物时,具有高固体悬浮能力(在剪切条件下)和刮水器脱扣的流体可能是一种经济的选择。反向循环技术的主要应用是在无法实现常规“正向”循环所需的泵速时,从大直径井眼中清除沙子。文丘里垃圾回收机通常用于回收较大或较重的物料,而这些物料无法通过传统方法进行处理。提供了现场案例,说明了如何根据操作和后勤条件选择正确的清洁方法以及如何有效地从井眼中清除沙子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号