首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Reflexive introspection: Methodological insights from four ethnographic studies
【24h】

Reflexive introspection: Methodological insights from four ethnographic studies

机译:反省的内省:来自四个民族志研究的方法论见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article contributes to scholarly knowledge relating to the methodological significance of reflexivity within consumer research by bringing fresh insights relating to the interplay between researcher and informant self-reflexivity. Findings from four ethnographic studies help us to extend our understanding of reflexivity within the data collection phase of interpretive research by explaining how the researcher and the researched can contribute to, and therefore impact the research environment significantly through a variation of reflexive practices. Reflections on our previously conducted ethnographic data sets reveal four reflexivity positions located at the intersection of the researcher and the informant: (1) co-researcher reflexivity, (2) informant controlled reflexivity, (3) researcher controlled reflexivity, and (4) liminal reflexivity. Within this context, we reveal how knowledge is co-created or co-produced by both the researchers and the informants. We then make some suggestions for addressing challenges faced by researchers within these reflexivity positions and the associated practices. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文通过带来有关研究人员与线人自反性之间相互作用的新见解,为有关反身性在消费者研究中的方法论意义的学术知识做出了贡献。四个人种学研究的结果通过解释研究人员和被研究者如何做出贡献,从而通过解释性实践的变化而对研究环境产生重大影响,从而帮助我们在解释性研究的数据收集阶段扩展了对反思性的理解。对我们之前进行的人种学数据集的反思揭示了位于研究者与举报者的交点处的四个反射性位置:(1)共同研究者的反射性,(2)知情者控制的反射性,(3)研究者控制的反射性,以及(4)门限反身性。在此背景下,我们揭示了研究人员和信息提供者如何共同创造或共同生产知识。然后,我们提出一些建议,以解决研究人员在这些反身位置和相关实践中面临的挑战。 Crown版权所有(C)2015,由Elsevier Inc.保留。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号