首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Clearing Up the Egoist Difficulty with Loyalty
【24h】

Clearing Up the Egoist Difficulty with Loyalty

机译:忠诚度消除利己主义的困难

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper seeks to analyze and to motivate a trend toward virtue ethics and away from deontology in the business ethics account of organizational loyalty. Prevailing authors appeal to "transcendent" values (deontology), skepticism (there is no loyalty), or Aristotelianism (loyalty is seeking mutual self-interest). I argue that the "Aristotelian" view clears up the "egoist" diculty with loyalty. Briefly, critics feel we must "transcend," "replace," "overcome" and most especially sacrifice self-interest on the altar of ethics and loyalty. I argue that few things can be more ethical than loyalty to shared values. When a company and I both pursue the same value X, there becomes no dierence between my seeking my best interest and my seeking the best interest of the company (and vice versa). Hence, the way out of the egoist diculty with loyalty is seeing a company's interests as my own (Aristotle's third stage of friendship).
机译:本文旨在分析并激发一种在组织忠诚度的商业道德说明中趋向于美德伦理学和远离义务论的趋势。流行的作者呼吁“超越”价值(道义论),怀疑主义(没有忠诚度)或亚里士多德主义(忠诚在寻求共同的自我利益)。我认为,“亚里士多德”观点以忠诚消除了“利己主义”教义。简而言之,批评家们认为我们必须“超越”,“替代”,“克服”,最重要的是在道德和忠诚的祭坛上牺牲自我利益。我认为,没有什么比忠于共同价值观更符合道德。当一家公司和我都追求相同的价值X时,在我寻求自己的最大利益与我追求公司的最大利益之间就没有区别(反之亦然)。因此,忠于自我主义者的方法是将公司的利益视为我自己的利益(亚里士多德的友谊的第三阶段)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号