首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Some Thoughts on Moriarty and Moeller
【24h】

Some Thoughts on Moriarty and Moeller

机译:关于莫里亚蒂和穆勒的一些思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a recent paper in Business Ethics Quarterly Professor Jeffrey Moriarty (2005) asserted the relevance of political philosophy to business ethics. Moriarty asked whether "businesses ought to be run (more) like states" and argued why that might be beneficial. This paper on the contrary asserts that there are distinct disadvantages to businesses attempting to be run more like states. Specifically, it asserts that any such an attempt increases the likelihood of the re-emergence of a totalitarian society as businesses currently often act as an intermediary between the individual and the state. The paper contemplates Moeller's ambitions in the Weimar period for the business to be run like a state and the historical outcome of those ambitions. The paper also distinguishes between two different kinds of rights and argues that different kinds of rights pertain to different sectors which preclude business being run like a state.
机译:Jeffrey Moriarty教授(2005)在《商业道德季刊》的最新论文中断言了政治哲学与商业道德的相关性。莫里亚蒂(Moriarty)询问“是否应该像州一样经营(更多)企业”,并指出了为什么这样做可能是有益的。相反,本文断言,试图像州一样运作的企业有明显的不利之处。具体而言,它断言,任何此类企图都会增加极权社会重新出现的可能性,因为企业当前经常充当个人与国家之间的中介。本文考虑了穆勒在魏玛时期的雄心壮志,以使企业像州一样运作,并展现这些雄心壮志的历史成果。本文还区分了两种不同类型的权利,并指出,不同类型的权利涉及不同的部门,从而阻止企业像国家一样运作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号