首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Whistle-Blowing for Profit: An Ethical Analysis of the Federal False Claims Act
【24h】

Whistle-Blowing for Profit: An Ethical Analysis of the Federal False Claims Act

机译:吹口哨谋取利益:《联邦虚假索赔法》的伦理分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper focuses on the 1986 Amendments to the False Claims Act of 1863, which offers whistle-blowers financial rewards for disclosing fraud committed against the U.S. government. This law provides an opportunity to examine underlying assumptions about the morality of whistle-blowing and to consider the merits of increased reliance on whistle-blowing to protect the public interest. The law seems open to a number of moral objections, most notably that it exerts a morally corrupting influence on whistle-blowers. We answer these objections and argue that the law is not objectionable on these grounds. Since there are no compelling moral objections to the law, it is appropriate and acceptable to judge the law in terms of its economic costs and benefits. We assess the most salient of these and conclude that the benefits outweigh the costs. We suggest that a mechanism similar to the Act should be considered for protecting stockholders' interests in the private sector. We conclude by making several proposals for improving the existing legislation.
机译:本文着重于1986年1863年《虚假索偿法案》的修正案,该案为揭密者揭露针对美国政府的欺诈行为提供了经济奖励。该法律提供了一个机会,可以审查有关举报道德的基本假设,并考虑增加依赖举报保护公共利益的优点。法律似乎对许多道德异议持开放态度,最明显的是,法律对举报人施加了道德上的破坏性影响。我们回答这些反对意见,并认为基于这些理由,法律并不令人反对。由于对法律没有令人信服的道德反对,因此根据法律的经济成本和收益来判断法律是适当且可以接受的。我们评估了其中最突出的一点,并得出结论认为收益大于成本。我们建议应考虑一种类似于该法的机制,以保护股东在私营部门的利益。最后,我们提出了一些改善现有立法的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号