首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >A Modular Approach to Business Ethics Integration: At the Intersection of the Stand-Alone and the Integrated Approaches
【24h】

A Modular Approach to Business Ethics Integration: At the Intersection of the Stand-Alone and the Integrated Approaches

机译:商业道德整合的模块化方法:在独立方法与综合方法的交叉点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While no one seems to believe that business schools or their faculties bear entire responsibility for the ethical decision-making processes of their students, these same institutions do have some burden of accountability for educating students surrounding these skills. To that end, the standards promulgated by the Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB), their global accrediting body, require that students learn ethics as part of a business degree. However, since the AACSB does not require the inclusion of a specific course to achieve this objective, it may be satisfied by establishing a stand-alone course in ethical decision-making, by integrating ethical decision-making into the existing curricula, by some combination of the two strategies, or through some alternative mechanism. Notwithstanding the choice of delivery process, though, the institution must ensure that it is able to demonstrate the students' achievement of learning with regard to ethics, a bar that was raised, or arguably simplyrnmodified, in 2003. With learning objectives designed precisely to measure the student delta based on content, process and engagement in a particular class, those programs that have opted for stand-alone ethics courses may be (though not necessarily are) more prepared to respond to assessment-related inquiries regarding their programs or satisfaction of the standards. The relevance of the AACSB standards modification to the current efforts at ethics integration in business programs is instead a re-examination of how to create a program of integration that is designed to ensure the most effective learning results possible, while responding to the challenges presented by the integrated approach. The purpose of this article is to explore some of those challenges that may be somewhat universal to business school programs implementing the integrated approach, and to share one large university's response to those challenges, along with lessons learned.
机译:尽管似乎没有人相信商学院或其院系对学生的道德决策过程负有全部责任,但这些机构确实承担了一些责任,以教育学生掌握这些技能。为此,其全球认证机构协会高级商学院(AACSB)颁布的标准要求学生学习道德作为商务学位的一部分。但是,由于AACSB不需要包括特定课程来实现此目标,因此可以通过建立道德决策的独立课程,通过将道德决策纳入现有课程中(通过某种组合)来满足这两种策略,或者通过某种替代机制。尽管选择了交付过程,但该机构必须确保它能够证明学生在道德方面的学习成就,这是在2003年提出的,或者可以说是简单修改过的标准。学习目标的设计旨在衡量根据特定班级的内容,过程和参与程度而得出的学生差异,那些选择了独立道德课程的课程可能(尽管不一定)会更愿意回应与评估有关的课程或课程满意度的询问。标准。 AACSB标准修改与当前业务计划中道德整合工作的相关性是对如何创建整合计划的重新检验,该计划旨在确保尽可能有效的学习结果,同时应对由挑战带来的挑战综合方法。本文的目的是探讨某些挑战,这些挑战对于实施综合方法的商学院课程可能是普遍存在的,并与一所大型大学分享这些挑战的经验教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号