首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Deficiencies in the Code of Conduct: The AICPA Rhetoric Surrounding the Tax Return Preparation Outsourcing Disclosure Rules
【24h】

Deficiencies in the Code of Conduct: The AICPA Rhetoric Surrounding the Tax Return Preparation Outsourcing Disclosure Rules

机译:行为准则中的缺陷:围绕报税表编制外包披露规则的AICPA修辞

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article, we examine the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' (AICPA) efforts to conceal the offshoring of tax return preparation services by U.S. Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) through recommending an inadequate disclosure format for this type of work. We draw on Giddens' theory of trust and expert systems, the professionalism literature, and Flyvbjerg's concept of power to analyze the underlying agenda behind the revised ethics rulings (AICPA Ethics Ruling No. 112 under Rule 102, No. 12 under Rule 201, and No. 1 under Rule 301). Specifically, we examine (1) the AICPA leadership's stated professional justifications for outsourcing and its recommended client disclosures, (2) risks associated with outsourcing tax return preparation work overseas and the trust issues that result, and (3) the resistance to the AICPA leadership's recommended outsourcing disclosure rules within the rank and file of the CPA profession. We argue that our analysis reveals the AICPA's on-going promotion of their private interests, thus continuing to raise systemic concerns regarding the public's trust in the U.S. public accounting profession.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了美国注册会计师协会(AICPA)为隐瞒美国注册会计师(CPA)的离岸报税准备服务而做出的努力,并为此建议了不适当的披露格式。我们利用吉登斯的信任和专家系统理论,专业主义文献以及弗莱比约的权力概念来分析经修订的道德准则背后的基本议程(《美国注册会计师协会道德准则》第102条第112款,《规则》第12条第12款,规则301(第1条)。具体来说,我们研究(1)AICPA领导层陈述的外包专业理由及其建议的客户披露,(2)与海外外包报税表工作相关的风险以及由此产生的信任问题,以及(3)对AICPA领导层的抵制建议在注册会计师行业的职等范围内外包披露规则。我们认为,我们的分析揭示了AICPA对其私人利益的持续促进,因此继续引起公众对公众对美国公共会计专业信任的系统关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号