首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Between Morals and Markets? An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Framework for Studying Working Conditions at Catholic Social Service Providers in Belgium and Germany
【24h】

Between Morals and Markets? An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Framework for Studying Working Conditions at Catholic Social Service Providers in Belgium and Germany

机译:在道德和市场之间? 用于学习比利时和德国天主教社会服务提供商的工作条件的跨学科概念框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite sharing Catholic Social Teaching (CST) as their system of morals and both being confronted with marketisation pressures, working conditions at German and Belgian Catholic social service providers (CSSPs) of elderly care differ. We argue that an interdisciplinary approach is needed to understand such differences, as interpretation of CST is mediated by local contexts. Working conditions result from interactions shaped by each country's respective religious, legal and socio-economic contexts, providing players with different levels of discretion and power resources. In Belgium, working conditions at Catholic elderly care providers tend to be better due to a strong Catholic trade union, encompassing labour market regulation and a universal legal system applying to all care providers. Moreover, there is strong interaction between these Catholic care providers and other Catholic institutions ("pillarisation"). By contrast, German CSSPs, operating as faith-based organisations with their own legal framework in a relatively liberalised and decentralised labour market, are able to use various flexibility practices which put pressure on working conditions. Using such practices is partially justified by the Catholic discourse on charity and altruism, stressing the particular nature of work in the Catholic care sector. Overall, the article demonstrates differences in the local application of CST. It also shows how transnational differences in working conditions at Catholic social service providers are the product of more than just local differences in the interpretation and application of CST principles, being shaped by interactions between a country's specific religious, legal and socio-economic contexts.
机译:尽管分享了天主教社会教学(CST)作为其道德制度,但两者都面临着市场化压力,德国和比利时天主教社会服务提供商(CSSP)的工作条件也有所不同。我们认为需要跨学科方法来了解这种差异,因为CST的解释是由当地背景介导的。每个国家各自的宗教,法律和社会经济背景的互动产生的工作条件导致,为球员提供不同的自由裁量权和电力资源。在比利时,天主教徒老年护理商的工作条件由于强大的天主教工会而往往更好,包括劳动力市场监管和适用于所有护理提供者的普遍法律制度。此外,这些天主教徒提供者和其他天主教机构之间存在强烈的相互作用(“泡沫化”)。相比之下,德国CSSPS在相对自由化和分散的劳动力市场中作为基于信仰的组织,能够在相对自由化和分散的劳动力市场中使用施加各种灵活性实践,这会对工作条件施加压力。使用此类实践受慈善和利他主义的天主教话语部分合理,强调了天主教护理部门的工作的特殊性。总体而言,本文展示了CST的局部应用的差异。它还展示了天主教社会服务提供商的工作条件的跨国差异是多于局部差异的产品,以审查和应用CST原则,是一个国家特定宗教,法律和社会经济背景之间的互动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号