...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Sweated Labor as a Social Phenomenon Lessons from the 19th Century Sweatshop Discussion
【24h】

Sweated Labor as a Social Phenomenon Lessons from the 19th Century Sweatshop Discussion

机译:将劳动力出汗作为19世纪的血汗工厂讨论的社会现象课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ongoing controversy about sweatshop labor has mainly focused on economic, on the one, and ethical aspects, on the other side. While proponents of sweatshop labor have argued that low wages would attract foreign investments, would create new workplace opportunities and thus improve economic welfare in less-developed countries, opponents of sweatshop labor argue that such treatment of laborers would violate their dignity, and they prompt western buyers to stop this kind of exploitation. However, the arguments in this debate are not new. As we will show, they can be traced back to the early "sweatshop" debate between social reformers and classical liberals in the 19th century. Interestingly, the 19th century debate identified sweatshop labor not as an industrial system but as a social phenomenon which becomes more likely when several social preconditions are fulfilled. It will be shown that the social preconditions identified in this debate determine working conditions till today and can be used to identify industries were sweatshop labor is more likely than in others-even in western countries.
机译:关于血汗工业劳动力的持续争议主要集中在另一边的一个和道德方面的经济上。尽管血汗工厂的支持者认为,低工资会吸引外国投资,将创造新的工作机会,从而提高经济福利在欠发达国家,血汗工厂的反对者认为,劳动者的这种处理会侵犯他们的尊严,他们迅速西部买家停止这种剥削。但是,这场辩论中的论点并不是新的。正如我们将展示的那样,他们可以追溯到19世纪社会改革者和古典自由主义之间的“血汗博普”辩论。有趣的是,19世纪的辩论确定了血汗工厂,而不是作为工业系统,而是作为一个社会现象,当满足几个社会前提时,这一社会现象变得更加可能。结果表明,在本次辩论中确定的社会前提确定了工作条件,直到今天,可以用来识别行业是血汗劳动力比其他人更有可能 - 即使在西方国家也是如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号