首页> 外文期刊>Journal of business & finance librarianship >Business Faculty's Attitudes: Open Access, Disciplinary Repositories, and Institutional Repositories
【24h】

Business Faculty's Attitudes: Open Access, Disciplinary Repositories, and Institutional Repositories

机译:商学院的态度:开放访问,学科存储库和机构存储库

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Business faculty were surveyed to determine their attitudes toward institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, and open access journals. The majority of faculty was unaware of institutional repositories at their local institutions. However, approximately one third are using disciplinary repositories and are receiving encouragement from their departments to do so. Likewise, many faculty are unaware of open access journals. Open access journals are seen as lacking prestige and being lower quality publications in the business field due to the lack of prestigious publishers and editors. Many faculty believe their prestige would fall if they published in an open access journal.
机译:对商学院进行了调查,以确定他们对机构知识库,学科知识库和开放获取期刊的态度。大多数教师并不知道其当地机构的机构资料库。但是,大约三分之一的人正在使用纪律资料库,并受到其部门的鼓励。同样,许多教师也不了解开放获取期刊。由于缺乏知名的出版商和编辑,开放存取期刊被视为缺乏信誉,并且在商业领域中是较低质量的出版物。许多教师认为,如果他们在开放获取期刊上发表论文,他们的威望就会下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号