首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation >Easement of support and the Party Wall Act: Misnomers and misunderstandings
【24h】

Easement of support and the Party Wall Act: Misnomers and misunderstandings

机译:放松支持和《政党墙法案》:误解和误解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper will examine in detail the area of law that applies to party walls by making comparison between the law before the emergence of the Metropolitan Buildings Act 1844 (including its successors) and its interaction with the said Act after its enactment. Hence, by critically looking at this area of law, it may be possible to see how Section 9 of the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 and its former counterpart (Section 54 of Part Ⅳ London Building Acts (Amendment) Act 1939) have been drafted. It would be fair to say that, generally, easements have been a rather complex area of law and are constantly evolving. Hence, it appears that it would have made a great deal of sense to avoid getting drawn into such an area of law within the ambit of the Party Wall Act. After all, the relative success of the said Act has been founded very much on its prescriptive nature. Accordingly, this paper will examine the foregoing inference.
机译:本文将通过比较《 1844年大城市建筑法》(包括其继承人)出台之前的法律与该法颁布后与该法的相互作用,来详细研究适用于政党隔离墙的法律领域。因此,从批判性地看这方面的法律,可能有可能看到《 1996年党墙等法》第9条及其前者(《 1939年伦敦建筑法(修订)法》第四部分第54条)是如何起草的。 。可以说,一般而言,地役权是一个相当复杂的法律领域,并且在不断发展。因此,似乎很有意义的是避免被《党墙法案》所涵盖的法律领域所吸引。毕竟,该法案的相对成功在很大程度上取决于其规定性。因此,本文将研究上述推论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号