...
首页> 外文期刊>Rivista di Biologia >EDITORIAL PREFACE TO A NEW CENTURY OF «THEORETICAL BIOLOGY FORUM»
【24h】

EDITORIAL PREFACE TO A NEW CENTURY OF «THEORETICAL BIOLOGY FORUM»

机译:《理论生物学论坛》新世纪的社论序言

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As we enter into the next era of Theoretical Biology Forum, and as we approach our 100th anniversary in 2019, this is obviously a time for reflection. Theoretical biology is by its very nature, a very broad discipline. And it typically attracts the interests of researchers outside of traditional disciplines. By its nature therefore, it is a minority discipline. The majority of biologists focus on the practice of research i.e. the «doing of science», as opposed to the thinking about it more broadly. With each major technical development there is an increased focus on the methods as opposed to the ideas that define any particular field of interest. When Theoretical Biology Forum was born in 1919 these disciplines were far more in balance. One has only to read the influential books of that time such as E. S. Russell's Form and Function which was originally published by J. Murray: London in 1916. There are 20 chapters. The first nine focus on the ideas of people, from the beginnings of comparative anatomy with Aristotle, then Cuvier, Goethe, St Hilaire, to Richard Owen, von Baer. The remaining 11 chapters focused on matters such as Cell Theory, Lamarck's Laws and the «Organism as an Historical Being». Of course, one might say, quite rightly, that there were few methodologies and experimental results to consider at that time. Nevertheless, it is clear that a strong focus and intellectual concentration was brought to bear on the larger ideas of that time. And I would challenge readers to study a little of that wonderful book and not be impressed by the clarity of thought which still has obvious implications for the study of theoretical biology today.
机译:随着我们进入理论生物学论坛的下一个时代,以及2019年即将迎来100周年纪念,这显然是反思的时候了。理论生物学本质上是一门非常广泛的学科。它通常会吸引传统学科之外的研究人员的兴趣。因此,就其性质而言,它是少数派学科。大多数生物学家专注于研究实践,即“做科学”,而不是更广泛地思考它。随着每项主要技术的发展,与定义任何特定感兴趣领域的想法相比,人们越来越关注这些方法。当1919年理论生物学论坛诞生时,这些学科之间的平衡要平衡得多。只需阅读当时颇有影响力的书籍,例如E. S. Russell的《形式与功能》,最初由J. Murray:1916年伦敦出版。共有20章。从与亚里斯多德的比较解剖学开始,到后来的居维叶,歌德,圣希拉尔,再到理查德·欧文,冯·贝尔,首先的九个人着眼于人的思想。其余11章重点讨论诸如细胞理论,拉马克定律和“有机体作为历史存在”之类的问题。当然,可以说得很对,当时没有什么方法论和实验结果需要考虑。然而,很明显,当时的大思想已引起了强烈的关注和思想集中。我会挑战读者去研究那本精彩的书,不要被思想的清晰所打动,思想的清晰对当今的理论生物学研究仍然具有明显的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Rivista di Biologia 》 |2018年第2期| 9-10| 共2页
  • 作者

    David Lambert;

  • 作者单位

    Griffith University Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号