首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Bioethical Inquiry >Don't Blame the ‘Bio’ — Blame the ‘Ethics’: Varieties of (bio) ethics and the challenge of pluralism
【24h】

Don't Blame the ‘Bio’ — Blame the ‘Ethics’: Varieties of (bio) ethics and the challenge of pluralism

机译:不要怪“生物” —怪“伦理” :(生物)伦理的多样性和多元化的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We tend to think that the difficulties in bioethics spring from the novel and alarming issues that arise due to discoveries in the new biosciences and biotechnologies. But many of the crucial difficulties in bioethics arise from the assumptions we make about ethics. This paper offers a brief overview of bioethics, and relates ethical ‘principlism’ to ‘ethical fundamentalism’. It then reviews some alternative approaches that have emerged during the second phase of bioethics, and argues for a neo-Aristotelian approach. Misconceptions about ethical principles and ethical reasoning not only distort our views of the business of bioethics, but they also prevent us from facing up to the formidable problems posed by ethical pluralism in so-called liberal societies.
机译:我们倾向于认为,由于新的生物科学和生物技术的发现而引起的新颖而令人震惊的问题,导致了生物伦理学方面的困难。但是,生物伦理学中的许多关键困难来自我们对伦理学的假设。本文简要概述了生物伦理学,并将伦理学的“原则主义”与“伦理学的原教旨主义”联系起来。然后,它回顾了生物伦理学第二阶段出现的一些替代方法,并提出了新亚里士多德方法。对伦理原则和伦理推理的误解不仅歪曲了我们对生物伦理​​学的看法,而且还使我们无法面对所谓的自由主义社会中伦理多元化所带来的巨大问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号