首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Behavioral Decision Making >Are Longshots Only for Losers? A New Look at the Last Race Effect
【24h】

Are Longshots Only for Losers? A New Look at the Last Race Effect

机译:长镜头只适合失败者吗?重新审视最后一场比赛的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is evidence that betting on longshots increases in the last race of a day of horse racing. Previous accounts have assumed that the phenomenon is driven by bettors who have lost money and are trying to recoup their losses. To test this assumption of "reference dependence," three laboratory experiments simulated a day at the races: In each of several rounds, participants chose either (i) a gamble with a small probability of a large gain and a large probability of a small loss (the "longshot") or (ii) a gamble with a moderate chance of a small gain or a small loss (the "favorite"). The first two experiments employed a game played for points, while a third experiment included monetary incentives and stimuli drawn from a real day of racing. These experiments provide a clear demonstration of the last race effect in a laboratory setting. However, the results indicate that the effect is largely reference independent: Participants were more likely to choose the longshot in the last round regardless of whether, and how much, they had won or lost in previous rounds. Winning or losing, bettors prefer to "go out with a bang" at the end of a series of gambles. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:有证据表明,在一日赛的最后一场比赛中,对远射的投注增加。以前的报道都认为这种现象是由投注者造成的,他们损失了钱并试图弥补损失。为了测试这种“参考依赖性”的假设,三个实验室实验在比赛中模拟了一天:在几轮比赛的每一轮中,参与者都选择了(i)博彩的可能性很小,而大获胜的可能性很小,而小亏损的可能性很大。 (以下简称“远景”)或(ii)具有中小获胜或小亏损机会的赌博(“最爱”)。前两个实验使用了得分游戏,而第三个实验则包括了在真实比赛中获得的金钱奖励和刺激。这些实验清楚地证明了实验室环境中最后一场比赛的影响。但是,结果表明,效果很大程度上是参考无关的:参与者在上一轮中选择远距离射击的可能性更高,无论他们在前一轮中获胜还是输了多少。获胜者或输者,下注者喜欢在一系列赌博结束时“大声疾呼”。版权所有(C)2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号