首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Stock repurchases: How firms choose between a self tender offer and an open-market program
【24h】

Stock repurchases: How firms choose between a self tender offer and an open-market program

机译:股票回购:公司如何在自报价和公开市场计划之间进行选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In practice, open-market stock repurchase programs outnumber self tender offers by approximately 10-1. This evidence is puzzling given that tender offers are more efficient in disbursing free cash and in signaling undervaluation - the two main motivations suggested in the literature for repurchasing shares. We provide a theoretical model to explore this puzzle. In the model, tender offers disburse free cash quickly but induce information asymmetry and hence require a price premium. Open-market programs disburse free cash slowly, and hence do not require a price premium, but because they are slow, result in partial free cash waste. The model predicts that the likelihood that a tender offer will be chosen over an open-market program increases with the agency costs of free cash and decreases with uncertainty (risk), information asymmetry, ownership concentration, and liquidity. These predictions are generally consistent with the empirical evidence.
机译:实际上,公开市场股票回购计划的数量比自投标要约多10-1。鉴于要约要价在支付自由现金和暗示低估方面更有效,这是令人困惑的,这是文献中提出的回购股票的两个主要动机。我们提供了一个理论模型来探索这个难题。在该模型中,招标提供了快速支付的自由现金,但会导致信息不对称,因此需要溢价。公开市场计划缓慢地发放自由现金,因此不需要价格溢价,但是由于它们缓慢,导致部分自由现金浪费。该模型预测,在公开市场计划中选择要约收购的可能性会随着自由现金的代理成本而增加,而随着不确定性(风险),信息不对称,所有权集中和流动性而降低。这些预测通常与经验证据一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号