...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Does deregulation induce competition in the market for corporate control? The special case of banking
【24h】

Does deregulation induce competition in the market for corporate control? The special case of banking

机译:放松管制会引发市场对公司控制权的竞争吗?银行的特殊情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using a sample of 936 acquisitions of commercial banks, we examine the relation between the probability to engage in value-reducing acquisitions and corporate governance structures, as well as the relation between acquirer announcement-period abnormal stock returns and antitakeover indices and measures, and how these relations were affected by the change in the market for corporate control, caused by deregulation due to the implementation of the Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 and the Financial Service Modernization Act of 1999, We find that prior to deregulation there is no relation between probability to engage in value destroying acquisitions or acquirer returns and antitakeover indices, whereas after the adoption of the FSMA, probability to engage in value destroying acquisitions and the stock market reaction to bidder M&A announcements are both significantly related to governance indexes and measures. Our findings further confirm the linkage between the market for corporate control, antitakeover indices and firm value.
机译:通过对936家商业银行的收购进行抽样,我们研究了从事价值降低型收购的可能性与公司治理结构之间的关系,以及收购方宣布期间的异常股票收益与反收购指标和措施之间的关系,以及这些关系受到因实施1994年《州际银行和分支机构效率法》和1999年《金融服务现代化法》而放松管制而引起的公司控制市场变化的影响,我们发现在放松管制之前没有任何关系参与价值破坏性收购或收购者收益的可能性与反收购指数之间的差异,而在采用FSMA之后,参与价值破坏性收购的可能性与股票市场对竞标者并购公告的反应都与治理指标和措施密切相关。我们的发现进一步证实了公司控制,反收购指数和公司价值之间的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号