首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Effect of the Basel Accord capital requirements on the loan-loss provisioning practices of Australian banks
【24h】

Effect of the Basel Accord capital requirements on the loan-loss provisioning practices of Australian banks

机译:《巴塞尔协议》资本要求对澳大利亚银行贷款损失准备金做法的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are two distinct regimes for bank provisioning in Australia: a forward-looking model for regulatory purposes and an incurred loss model for financial reporting. This study examines the former using a unique but confidential database. We find evidence that: (i) banks increase provisions in anticipation of future lending growth, (ii) banks allocate part of surplus capital above regulatory requirements to pre-fund future credit losses through provisions, and (iii) banks allocate part of higher earnings for the same purpose. These results suggest that bank managers use their discretion in setting provisions to dampen the impact of fluctuations in credit market conditions on their lending activities. For internal ratings-based banks, results suggest that the revised Basel framework allowing these banks to estimate expected losses using their own credit risk models may come at a cost of reduced general provisions. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:澳大利亚有两种不同的银行准备金制度:用于监管目的的前瞻性模型和用于财务报告的已发生损失模型。本研究使用唯一但机密的数据库检查了前者。我们发现以下证据:(i)银行为预期未来贷款增长而增加准备金;(ii)银行通过准备金将超出监管要求的部分盈余资本用于预备未来信贷损失,以及(iii)银行分配较高收益的一部分出于相同的目的。这些结果表明,银行经理可以运用自己的判断力来制定准备金,以减轻信贷市场状况波动对其借贷活动的影响。对于基于内部评级的银行,结果表明,修订后的巴塞尔框架允许这些银行使用其自身的信用风险模型来估计预期损失可能会以减少一般准备金为代价。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号