首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders >Comparing Autism, PDD-NOS, and Other Developmental Disabilities on Parent-Reported Behavior Problems: Little Evidence for ASD Subtype Validity
【24h】

Comparing Autism, PDD-NOS, and Other Developmental Disabilities on Parent-Reported Behavior Problems: Little Evidence for ASD Subtype Validity

机译:自闭症,PDD-NOS和其他发育障碍在父母报告的行为问题上的比较:ASD亚型有效性的证据很少

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies on the distinction between Autistic Disorder (AD) and Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS) have been inconclusive. This study examined the validity of PDD-NOS by comparing it to AD and other developmental disorders (DD) on parent-reported behavior problems. Fifty-four children with PDD-NOS were individually matched on age and non-verbal IQ to 54 children with AD and 54 children with DD. Groups were compared on select subscales of the Child Behavior Checklist. High rates of psychopathology were observed in both ASD groups. The only difference between PDD-NOS and AD groups was higher scores in the PDD-NOS group on two items measuring Anxiety/Depression. Cognitive functioning may be a more salient variable than subtype when studying psychopathology in individuals with ASDs.
机译:关于自闭症(AD)和其他未明确定义的普遍性发育障碍(PDD-NOS)之间的区别的研究尚无定论。这项研究通过将PDD-NOS与AD和其他在父母报告的行为问题上的发育障碍(DD)进行比较来检验其有效性。 54名PDD-NOS患儿的年龄和非语言智商分别与54名AD患儿和54名DD患儿相匹配。在儿童行为清单的选定子量表上比较各组。在两个ASD组中均观察到较高的精神病理学率。 PDD-NOS和AD组之间的唯一区别是PDD-NOS组在两项测量焦虑/抑郁的项目上得分较高。在研究患有自闭症患者的心理病理学时,认知功能可能比亚型更为明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号