...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology >Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation
【24h】

Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation

机译:脉冲频率和极性对听觉脑干和人工耳蜗使用者对电刺激敏感性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To further understand the response of the human brainstem to electrical stimulation, a series of experiments compared the effect of pulse rate and polarity on detection thresholds between auditory brainstem implant (ABI) and cochlear implant (CI) patients. Experiment 1 showed that for 400-ms pulse trains, ABI users’ thresholds dropped by about 2 dB as pulse rate was increased from 71 to 500 pps, but only by an average of 0.6 dB as rate was increased further to 3500 pps. This latter decrease was much smaller than the 7.7-dB observed for CI users. A similar result was obtained for pulse trains with a 40-ms duration. Furthermore, experiment 2 showed that the threshold difference between 500- and 3500-pps pulse trains remained much smaller for ABI than for CI users, even for durations as short as 2 ms, indicating the effect of a fast-acting mechanism. Experiment 3 showed that ABI users’ thresholds were lower for alternating-polarity than for fixed-polarity pulse trains, and that this difference was greater at 3500 pps than at 500 pps, consistent with the effect of pulse rate on ABI users’ thresholds being influenced by charge interactions between successive biphasic pulses. Experiment 4 compared thresholds and loudness between trains of asymmetric pulses of opposite polarity, in monopolar mode, and showed that in both cases less current was needed when the anodic, rather than the cathodic, current was concentrated into a short time interval. This finding is similar to that previously observed for CI users and is consistent with ABI users being more sensitive to anodic than cathodic current. We argue that our results constrain potential explanations for the differences in the perception of electrical stimulation by CI and ABI users, and have potential implications for future ABI stimulation strategies.
机译:为了进一步了解人脑干对电刺激的反应,一系列实验比较了听觉脑干植入物(ABI)和耳蜗植入物(CI)患者之间的脉搏频率和极性对检测阈值的影响。实验1表明,对于400毫秒的脉冲序列,随着脉冲频率从71 pps增加到500 pps,ABI用户的阈值下降了约2 dB,但随着速度进一步提高到3500 pps,平均仅下降了0.6 dB。后者的下降远小于CI用户观察到的7.7 dB。对于持续时间为40毫秒的脉冲序列,也获得了类似的结果。此外,实验2显示,即使持续时间短至2 ms,ABI的500-3500 pps脉冲序列之间的阈值差仍然比CI用户小得多,这表明了快速作用机制的效果。实验3表明,交流极性的ABI用户阈值低于固定极性的脉冲序列,并且这种差异在3500 pps时比在500 pps时更大,这与脉冲速率对ABI用户阈值的影响相一致通过连续的双相脉冲之间的电荷相互作用。实验4在单极模式下比较了相反极性的不对称脉冲序列之间的阈值和响度,结果表明,在两种情况下,当阳极而不是阴极集中在较短的时间间隔时,需要的电流都较小。这一发现与先前对CI用户所观察到的发现相似,并且与ABI用户对阳极比对阴极电流更敏感的现象一致。我们认为我们的结果限制了CI和ABI用户对电刺激感知的差异的潜在解释,并且对未来的ABI刺激策略具有潜在的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号