首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian earth sciences >Crustal stress pattern in China and its adjacent areas
【24h】

Crustal stress pattern in China and its adjacent areas

机译:中国及其附近地区的地壳应力模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the update of the World Stress Map (WSM) database, we integrated the China stress database by strictly using the internationally developed quality ranking scheme for each individual stress data record. This effort resulted in a comprehensive and reliable dataset for the crustal stress of China and its adjacent areas with almost double the amount of data records from the WSM database release 2008, i.e., a total of 8228 data records with reliable A-C qualities in the region of 45-155 degrees East and 0-60 degrees North. We use this dataset for an analysis of the stress pattern for the orientation of maximum compressive horizontal stress (S-Hmax). In contrast to earlier findings that suggested that the mean S-Hmax orientation would be aligned with the direction of plate motion, we clearly see from our results that the plate boundary forces, as well as topography and faulting, are important control factors for the overall stress pattern. Furthermore, the smoothing results indicate that the S-Hmax orientation in China rotates clockwise from the west to the east, which results in a fan-shaped crustal stress pattern for the continental scale. The plate boundary forces around China, which are the Indian-Eurasian plate collision in the west and the Pacific plate subduction and the push from the Philippine plate in the east, can still be seen as the key driving processes and the first-order controls for the crustal stress pattern. The South-North seismic zone can be seen as the separation zone for the western and eastern plate boundary forces. Topographic variation and faulting activity, however, provide second-order changes, and lead to local variations and different in homogeneity scales for the stress pattern. Due to differences in these factors, Northeast China and the central part of the Tibetan plateau have notably homogeneous stress patterns, while the South-North seismic zone, the Hindu Kush-Pamir region, and the Taiwan region have extremely inhomogeneous stress patterns. Furthermore, the different behaviors of stress orientations around continental and oceanic plate boundaries could imply that complicated mechanisms exist and warrant further and more specific studies.
机译:在更新世界应力图(WSM)数据库的过程中,我们严格按照国际开发的质量排名方案对每个应力数据记录进行了整合,整合了中国应力数据库。这项工作为中国及其邻近地区的地壳应力提供了一个全面而可靠的数据集,其数据记录的数量几乎是2008年WSM数据库发布数据的两倍,即,在2007年该地区共有8228个具有可靠AC品质的数据记录。东经45-155度,北经0-60度。我们使用该数据集来分析最大横向压缩应力(S-Hmax)方向的应力模式。与较早的发现表明平均S-Hmax方向将与板块运动的方向对齐相反,我们从我们的结果中清楚地看到,板块边界力以及形貌和断层是整个板块的重要控制因素。应力模式。此外,平滑处理结果表明,中国的S-Hmax方向从西向东顺时针旋转,这导致了大陆规模的扇形地壳应力模式。中国周围的板块边界力,仍然是西部地区的印欧板块碰撞和太平洋板块俯冲以及东部的菲律宾板块的推动,仍被认为是中国大陆板块边界力的关键驱动过程和一阶控制。地壳应力模式。南北地震带可以看作是西部和东部板块边界力的分离区。但是,地形变化和断层活动提供了二级变化,并导致局部变化和应力模式的均一性尺度不同。由于这些因素的差异,中国东北地区和青藏高原中部的应力模式特别明显,而南北地震带,兴都库什-帕米尔地区和台湾地区的应力模式却非常不均匀。此外,大陆板块和大洋板块边界周围应力取向的不同行为可能意味着存在复杂的机制,需要进行进一步和更具体的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号