首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian earth sciences >Late Devonian-early Permian subduction-accretion of the Zharma-Saur oceanic arc, West Junggar (NW China): Insights from field geology, geochemistry and geochronology
【24h】

Late Devonian-early Permian subduction-accretion of the Zharma-Saur oceanic arc, West Junggar (NW China): Insights from field geology, geochemistry and geochronology

机译:西准gar尔Zharma-Saur海洋弧的晚泥盆世-早二叠世俯冲-增生:来自野外地质,地球化学和地球年代学的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Migration of arc magmatism is of significant importance for accretionary orogens, but few examples have been documented in ancient orogens. In this paper we report late Paleozoic-early Permian, migrating magmatism of the intra-oceanic Zharma-Saur arc in the Tarbagatay Mountains, West Junggar, NW China, in order to address the general role of a growing arc in accretionary orogenesis, and the debates on the formation and timing of the Kazakhstan orocline in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB). Our detailed field work suggests that in the Zharma-Saur arc plutons and dikes intruded and lavas erupted in association with accretionary complexes that were dominated by ocean plate stratigraphy (OPS). Mafic to intermediate magmas have arc-type geochemical signatures such as depleted HFSEs and enrichments in LILEs and LREEs, coupled with high epsilon Nd(t) (+ 5.7 to + 6.8) to low Sr-87/Sr-86 initial values (+0.7035 to +0.7037). The Tarbagatay accreted rocks contain early Paleozoic pillow lavas, which have depleted LILEs, high eNd(t) (+7.4 to +8.2) and high Sr-87/Sr-86 initial values (+0.7041 to +0.7063). These data suggest that the Zharma-Saur arc was an intra-oceanic island arc that developed on accreted OPS material. U-Pb zircon isotopic data (the ZWTB I diorite pluton, 322 +/- 3 Ma; the JLDK diorite pluton, 318 +/- 4 Ma; andesitic lavas, 312 +/- 2 Ma, 310 +/- 4 Ma, 301 +/- 3 Ma) demonstrate that the Zharma-Saur arc magmatism occurred in the late Paleozoic. Integration with published geochronological data on the Zharma-Saur arc leads to a complex model of arc growth with a general southward younging of the arc magmatism from 383 Ma to 262 Ma. These relations imply a southward growth and migration of the magmatic axis of the Zharma-Saur arc that was associated with a short period of ridge subduction. The magmatic activity of the Zharma-Saur arc that probably continued until the early Permian resulted from migrations towards the forearc and backarc, as well as oblique or parallel motion to the trench. These new results not only provide robust evidence for resolving controversies about the Phanerozoic accretionary and continental growth of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, but also shed light on the migration of magmatisni in accretionary orogens in general.
机译:弧岩浆活动对增生造山带具有重要意义,但古代造山带中尚无记载的例子。在本文中,我们报道了晚西北生代-早二叠纪,西内加尔西部塔巴塔盖山中大洋内部Zharma-Saur弧的迁移岩浆作用,目的是解决生长弧在增生造山作用中的一般作用,以及关于中亚造山带(CAOB)中哈萨克斯坦轨道斜线的形成和时间的辩论。我们详细的野外工作表明,在Zharma-Saur弧中,侵入岩体和堤防和熔岩喷发与增生复合体有关,而增生复合体主要由海床地层学(OPS)主导。基性到中性岩浆具有弧型地球化学特征,例如HFSE枯竭以及LILE和LREE中的富集,以及高εNd(t)(+ 5.7至+ 6.8)至低Sr-87 / Sr-86初始值(+0.7035)至+0.7037)。 Tarbagatay增生的岩石包含早期古生代枕状熔岩,其中LILE耗竭,eNd(t)高(+7.4至+8.2)和Sr-87 / Sr-86初始值高(+0.7041至+0.7063)。这些数据表明Zharma-Saur弧是在增生的OPS材料上发育的洋内岛弧。 U-Pb锆石同位素数据(ZWTB I闪长岩岩体,322 +/- 3 Ma; JLDK闪长岩岩体,318 +/- 4 Ma;安山岩熔岩,312 +/- 2 Ma,310 +/- 4 Ma,301 +/- 3 Ma)表明Zharma-Saur弧岩浆作用发生在古生代晚期。与Zharma-Saur弧上已发布的地质年代数据相结合,得出了一个复杂的弧增长模型,弧岩浆作用普遍向南年轻化(从383 Ma到262 Ma)。这些关系意味着Zharma-Saur弧的岩浆轴向南生长和迁移,这与短时期的山脊俯冲有关。 Zharma-Saur弧的岩浆活动可能一直持续到二叠纪早期,这是由于向前臂和后弧的迁移以及向沟渠的倾斜或平行运动造成的。这些新结果不仅为解决有关中亚造山带生代生屑和大陆增长的争议提供了有力的证据,而且为一般岩浆在增生造山带中的迁移提供了启示。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Asian earth sciences》 |2017年第1期|424-445|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Xinjiang Res Ctr Mineral Resources, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China|Xinjiang Key Lab Mineral Resources & Digital Geol, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Xinjiang Res Ctr Mineral Resources, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China|Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, State Key Lab Lithospher Evolut, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;

    Univ Leicester, Dept Geol, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, State Key Lab Lithospher Evolut, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Xinjiang Res Ctr Mineral Resources, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China|Xinjiang Key Lab Mineral Resources & Digital Geol, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, Peoples R China;

    Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China|Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, State Key Lab Lithospher Evolut, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;

    Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China|Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, State Key Lab Lithospher Evolut, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Xinjiang Res Ctr Mineral Resources, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China|Xinjiang Key Lab Mineral Resources & Digital Geol, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Zharma-Saur island arc; Crustal growth; West Junggar; CAOB;

    机译:Zharma-Saur岛弧;结壳生长;西准gar尔;CAOB;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号