首页> 外文期刊>Journal of arid environments >Quantifying riparian total evaporation along the Groot Letaba River: A comparison between infilled and spatially downscaled satellite derived total evaporation estimates
【24h】

Quantifying riparian total evaporation along the Groot Letaba River: A comparison between infilled and spatially downscaled satellite derived total evaporation estimates

机译:量化格鲁特·勒塔巴河沿岸的河道总蒸发量:实测卫星和空间缩小的卫星得出的总蒸发量估算值之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The use of satellite earth observation data for the estimation of evapotranspiration has been well documented and represents a viable approach for the quantification of riparian water use at landscape to regional scales. However, the trade-off between the spatial and temporal resolution associated with imagery can limit the reliability of satellite-based evapotranspiration modelling. This study investigated two approaches to quantify evapotranspiration at a moderate spatial resolution (30 m) on a daily time step, for a perennial river flowing through a semi-arid, savanna landscape. The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) Model was used to derive daily evapotranspiration from satellite imagery. The actual crop coefficient (Kc(act)) and output downscaling with linear regression (ODLR) approaches were then evaluated by comparing their respective estimates against Eddy covariance (ECET) measurements at two locations. Comparisons of ET estimates acquired using the Kc(act) and ODLR approaches against ECET, yielded RMSE values of; 1.88 and 2.57 mm d(-1) and 1.10 and 2.39 mm d(-1) (for two replicate transects), respectively. The poor performance of these techniques was largely attributed to the SEBS ET estimates used as inputs to these techniques, as SEBS may overestimate evapotranspiration during conditions of water stress. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:利用卫星地球观测数据估算蒸散量已得到充分证明,这是量化景观到区域尺度河岸用水的可行方法。但是,与图像相关的时空分辨率之间的权衡可能会限制基于卫星的蒸散量建模的可靠性。这项研究针对流经半干旱热带稀树草原景观的多年生河流,研究了两种方法,可以在每日时间步长上以中等空间分辨率(30 m)量化蒸散量。表面能平衡系统(SEBS)模型用于从卫星图像导出每日蒸散量。然后通过将它们各自的估计值与两个位置的涡度协方差(ECET)测量值进行比较,评估实际的作物系数(Kc(act))和通过线性回归(ODLR)方法进行的输出缩减。使用Kc(act)和ODLR方法对ECET进行的ET估算值的比较得出RMSE值;分别为1.88和2.57毫米d(-1)和1.10和2.39毫米d(-1)(对于两个重复样带)。这些技术的较差性能主要归因于SEBS ET估计用作这些技术的输入,因为SEBS可能高估了水分胁迫条件下的蒸散量。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of arid environments》 |2017年第12期|114-124|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Water Resources Res, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;

    Univ Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa;

    Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Water Resources Res, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa|South African Natl Pk, Conservat Management, Skukuza, South Africa;

    South African Environm Observat Network, Ndlovu Node, Phalaborwa, South Africa;

    South African Environm Observat Network, Ndlovu Node, Phalaborwa, South Africa;

    Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Water Resources Res, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Total evaporation; Satellite imagery; SEBS; Infilling; Downscaling;

    机译:总蒸发量;卫星图像;SEBS;填充;缩小比例;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号