首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Architectural Engineering >Are Two 2-Hour Fire Rated Shutters Equivalent to a 4-Hour Shutter Using ASTM E119?
【24h】

Are Two 2-Hour Fire Rated Shutters Equivalent to a 4-Hour Shutter Using ASTM E119?

机译:使用ASTM E119,两个2小时耐火百叶窗是否等效于4小时百叶窗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Performance-based design is commonly applied to projects that have difficulties in complying with prescriptive fire codes in the Far East. There are procedures for evaluating fire resisting construction and structural elements with fire resistance ratings lower than the values specified in the fire codes. The equal temperature-time exposure concept or f-equivalent rule is commonly applied to support the argument. This paper will discuss whether installing two fire shutters each of a 2-hour fire resistance period is equivalent to one 4-hour shutter. The standard temperature-time curve under ASTM E119 was applied to show they are not equivalent and to illustrate the inadequacy. Further, there are concerns in applying such an approach for bigger fires as the radiative heat flux acting on the construction element is not included. Fire hazard assessment on fire resisting construction with lower ratings under postflashover fires should be evaluated with caution. Full-scale burning tests with bigger fires are suggested as a means to support the argument or demonstrate that the equal temperature-time concept would work as expected.
机译:基于性能的设计通常应用于在远东地区难以遵守规范性消防法规的项目。有一些评估耐火等级低于耐火规范中指定值的耐火结构和结构元件的程序。等温-时间暴露概念或f等效规则通常用于支持该论点。本文将讨论在两个小时的耐火期中安装两个防火百叶窗是否等效于一个四个小时的百叶窗。应用了ASTM E119下的标准温度-时间曲线来表明它们不相等并说明其不足。此外,由于不包括作用在建筑元件上的辐射热通量,因此对于大火应用这种方法存在关注。在闪络后火灾下,对额定值较低的耐火建筑进行火灾危险评估时,应谨慎评估。建议使用大火进行全面燃烧测试,以支持该论点或证明等温时间概念将按预期工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号