首页> 外文期刊>Journal of architectural education >Categories of ACSA Conference Papers A Critical Evaluation of Architectural Research in Light of Social Science Methodological Frameworks
【24h】

Categories of ACSA Conference Papers A Critical Evaluation of Architectural Research in Light of Social Science Methodological Frameworks

机译:ACSA会议论文类别:根据社会科学方法论框架对建筑研究进行的批判性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper critically assesses current architectural research, as represented in a sampling of papers presented at ACSA conferences, through the lens of research typologies related to people-place interactions taken from neighboring fields in the social sciences. Specifically, 253 papers from four ACSA conferences were assessed for methodological approaches to their objects of inquiry. This resulted in a tabulation of all the papers into nine methodological categories, ranging from interpretive approaches to causal-experimental approaches to design projects. These nine categories are critically evaluated in light of extant people-place research frameworks from the social science literature. The paper concludes by suggesting that established social science frameworks can help clarify the architectural research realm, particularly in the "interpretive" range, and that "design" offers a unique venue within which sociological approaches such as critical theory and/or grounded theory can find expression.
机译:本文通过在ACSA会议上发表的论文样本中,以与社会科学相邻领域的人地相互作用相关的研究类型为视角,对当前的建筑研究进行了严格的评估。具体来说,对来自四个ACSA会议的253篇论文进行了评估,以探讨其研究对象的方法。这导致将所有论文制成表格,分为九种方法论类别,从解释性方法到因果实验方法到设计项目。根据社会科学文献中现有的人地研究框架对这九类进行了严格的评估。本文的结论是建议建立的社会科学框架可以帮助阐明建筑研究领域,尤其是在“解释性”范围内,而“设计”提供了一个独特的场所,可以在其中找到诸如批评理论和/或扎根理论之类的社会学方法。表达。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号