...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied econometrics >AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN THE SYNTHETIC CONTROL METHOD AND HSIAO ET AL.'S PANEL DATA APPROACH TO PROGRAM EVALUATION
【24h】

AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN THE SYNTHETIC CONTROL METHOD AND HSIAO ET AL.'S PANEL DATA APPROACH TO PROGRAM EVALUATION

机译:综合控制方法与HAIAO等人程序评估中面板数据方法的实证比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compare two program evaluation methodologies: the synthetic control method and the panel data approach. We apply both methods to estimate the effect of the political and economic integration of Hong Kong. The results obtained differ depending on the methodology used. We then conduct a simulation that shows that the synthetic control method results in a post-treatment mean squared error, mean absolute percentage error, and mean error with a smaller interquartile range, whenever there is a good enough match. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:我们比较了两种程序评估方法:综合控制方法和面板数据方法。我们采用两种方法来估计香港政治和经济一体化的影响。所获得的结果取决于所使用的方法。然后,我们进行了仿真,表明只要有足够好的匹配,该综合控制方法就会导致处理后的均方误差,平均绝对百分比误差和较小四分位数间距的平均误差。版权所有(C)2016 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号