首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anglican Studies >John Maiden, National Religion and the Prayer Book Controversy 1927–1928 (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009), pp. 210, ISBN 978-1-84383-521-9 (hbk).
【24h】

John Maiden, National Religion and the Prayer Book Controversy 1927–1928 (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2009), pp. 210, ISBN 978-1-84383-521-9 (hbk).

机译:约翰·梅登(John Maiden),《 1921年至1928年的国家宗教和祈祷书之争》(伍德布里奇:博德尔出版社,2009年),第210页,ISBN 978-1-84383-521-9(hbk)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Prayer Book crisis of 1927–28 saw one of the great set-piece debates in twentieth-century parliamentary history. Parliament's refusal – twice – to let the established Church change its liturgy was also the last battle in a much longer turf-war between Church and State in England. And yet it is likely that if one asked a class of history undergraduates about the Prayer Book crisis today, not one of them would have heard of it. They would not get much help if they looked it up in a textbook. A.J.P. Taylor's English History 1914–1945 (1965) dismissed the episode as ‘the echo of dead themes’, while more recent histories of twentieth-century Britain have ignored it altogether. So did Callum Brown's Religion and Society in Twentieth-Century Britain (2006). While the crisis has spawned a handful of articles and chapters, it has not – until now – been the subject of a dedicated monograph.
机译:1927-28年的《祈祷书》危机是20世纪议会历史上最伟大的辩论之一。议会两次拒绝让已建立的教堂改变礼拜仪式,这也是英格兰教堂与州政府之间进行更长距离争夺战的最后一战。但是,如果今天有人问一类历史本科生有关《祈祷书》危机的消息,可能没有一个人会听说。如果他们在教科书中查找它们,将不会得到太多帮助。 A.J.P.泰勒(Taylor)的《英国历史1914–1945(1965)》将这一集视为“死主题的回声”,而最近的20世纪英国历史则完全忽略了这一集。卡伦·布朗(Callum Brown)在20世纪英国的宗教与社会(2006)也是如此。尽管这场危机催生了几篇文章和章节,但直到现在,它还没有成为专门专着的主题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Anglican Studies》 |2011年第2期|p.247-249|共3页
  • 作者

    Matthew Grimley;

  • 作者单位

    Merton College, Oxford;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:04:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号