首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis >Comparison between off-line and on-line derivatisation methods in the characterisation of siccative oils in paint media
【24h】

Comparison between off-line and on-line derivatisation methods in the characterisation of siccative oils in paint media

机译:离线和在线衍生化方法在表征油漆介质中干燥油中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The characterisation of siccative oils (drying oils used in paint media) by gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry using three derivatisation methods has been investigated and the differences in results discussed. The classic off-line derivatisation method with (trimethyl)silyldiazomethane has been compared with two alternative methods. The first involves on-line derivatisation using tetramethy-lammoniun hydroxide; in this case the reaction is performed in a pyrolysis interface at 600℃. The second uses (m-trifluoromethylphenyl)-trimethylammonium hydroxide as a derivatisation reagent (lower temperature required for methylation reaction without using the pyrolysis interface). The three methodologies have been found to give reproducible and comparable results for the different types of fresh and aged oils investigated.
机译:研究了使用三种衍生化方法通过气相色谱/质谱法对干燥油(用于涂料介质的干油)进行表征的方法,并讨论了结果的差异。用(三甲基)甲硅烷基重氮甲烷的经典离线衍生化方法已与两种替代方法进行了比较。第一个涉及使用四甲基拉莫氢氧化物在线衍生化;在这种情况下,反应在600℃的热解界面中进行。第二种使用(间三氟甲基苯基)三甲基氢氧化铵作为衍生试剂(不使用热解界面进行甲基化反应所需的较低温度)。对于所研究的不同类型的新鲜和陈化油,已发现这三种方法可提供可重复和可比较的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号