首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis >Pyrolysis of tyres: A comparison of the results from a fixed-bed laboratory reactor and a pilot plant (rotatory reactor)
【24h】

Pyrolysis of tyres: A comparison of the results from a fixed-bed laboratory reactor and a pilot plant (rotatory reactor)

机译:轮胎热解:固定床实验室反应器和中试装置(旋转反应器)的结果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A comparison is made of two similar processes run on different scales. On one hand, tyre pyrolysis experiments were run in a fixed-bed laboratory reactor, designed to allow for the separation of the solid, liquid and gas fractions. On the other hand, experiments were run in a tyre pyrolysis pilot plant with a rotatory reactor, where solid and gaseous fractions were obtained. The solid fractions from both processes were subjected to chemical analyses (proximate, elemental and of calorific value) and thermal analyses, with no significant differences found in the analyses of the two solid fractions. The gas fractions from both processes were analysed by gas chromatography, the results showing small differences in composition and calorific value, because of the different operating conditions of each facility, mainly the heating ramp and residence time.
机译:比较了两个以不同规模运行的类似过程。一方面,轮胎热解实验是在固定床实验室反应器中进行的,该反应器旨在分离固体,液体和气体部分。另一方面,在具有旋转反应器的轮胎热解中试装置中进行了实验,在其中获得了固体和气体馏分。对两种工艺的固体馏分进行化学分析(近似值,元素值和热值)和热分析,在两种固体馏分的分析中未发现明显差异。通过气相色谱分析两种工艺的气体馏分,结果表明,由于每种设备的操作条件(主要是加热升温和停留时间)不同,组成和热值差异很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号